Adding Another Spring To The Recon
#26
Posted 02 January 2008 - 03:10 PM
#27
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:17 PM
And I just accquired a BBB spring...
I'll be using that for the replacement, implying the plunger won't snap
-Chief
#28
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:31 AM
I also think that a bigger gauge spring would work better, if the Recon can handle that much extra force. If it can't, I'm sure some reinforcement would do the trick.
Great initial idea though! I never would have thought of this myself, and I'm really glad that many of us are finding ways to improve upon it.
-Diablo
NHQ Administrator | www.nerfhq.com
#29
Posted 05 January 2008 - 11:11 AM
A more compressed spring would warrant better results. By shortening the space the spring has to compress, more compression will occur, and thus a greater force will be exerted upon firing.
I would say the easier way and maybe even better way would be to put in a smaller spring like a maverick spring on the dead space in the plunger and keep the center peice of the stock. With a DGK breech(CPVC breech that I made, felt like giving it a name, stands for Dirty Ghetto Kids) And the mav spring on I can get a pretty fast 80 ft or more out of this gun.
Talio in Shoutbox.
#30
Posted 07 January 2008 - 11:23 PM
A "more compressed" spring is not better than a "partially compressed" spring if it's the same spring. You're going to get about three inches of displacement for any spring, just because that's how long the "ARMED" thing is.
Hooke's law tells us that Force = SpringConstant * Displacement.
As I said before, we know Displacement is always three inches. So if you take the original setup, with that super-long spring that extends to the rear, and assign the spring a constant of K, then your force is 3K.
I believe it was suggested to use a shorter spring that fully compresses. However, this is still only going to have three inches of compression, so unless its spring constant is greater than K, it will have the EXACT same effect. Seeing as how the OP was using the AR-15 spring, I doubt anyone was suggesting sticking anything much stronger in there.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that "compression" yields a linear increase in force. Compressing it the first inch gets just as big of a jump in force as the last inch does.
So the original setup really can't be improved on much.
That said, I did the same mod a little differently.
The first thing I did was fashion the above items. First, crack open that middle piece of the stock. Find a wooden shim and cut/file it down in the appropriate way such that it creates a "base" perpendicular to the direction of the compression of the spring. Glue the spring to it. In order to ensure the spring didn't mess up the plastic of the ARMED piece, I glued a washer to the other end of the spring.
The second piece is created by getting your pipe cut to a length such that it is flush with the black square end of the gun, AND the middle piece of the stock when the gun is connected to the stock. Finally, bore a hole (I used a dremel tool) in the middle stock piece with the same inner diameter as the tube. I used a sparing amount of hot glue to affix the tube to one half of the stock piece.
Connected, they appear as so:
Another angle, you can see the washer here:
Fully assembled:
Attached to the gun:
I'm sure the spring I used wasn't quite as strong as the AR-15 spring. In fact, I had to the clip it a little, because even fully compressed it was physically too large, and this made the cocking of the Recon impossible. However, even though I shortened it, I've seen noticeable range increases, and the gun can still be cocked almost as quickly as it could before.
I would be wary of sticking anything much stronger in there, as the mechanism that holds the stock on is what takes the entirety of the strain of the spring (at least it does the way I crafted it). I worry that anything much stronger will just snap the stock off, perhaps in an irreparable way.
Thoughts?
-Spike Spiegel
"Trendy, hip OMC Quote"
-OMC
#31
Posted 08 January 2008 - 07:15 AM
I have a BBB spring I could use for the OP mod.
But I thought It would break anyway. Meh.
-Chief
#32
Posted 08 January 2008 - 11:13 AM
I believe this one is rated around 165 N/m. I've used a similar spring before in a LS spring addition, and achieved typical results, if that gives you an idea of how strong this spring is.
-Spike Spiegel
"Trendy, hip OMC Quote"
-OMC
#33
Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:37 AM
#34
Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:54 PM
I didn't use a specific spring (BBB, NF, etc.), as I don't have a ready supply of any of those. Instead, I just pick up an bunch of springs from the hardware store, and use the strongest one that will fit.
I believe this one is rated around 165 N/m. I've used a similar spring before in a LS spring addition, and achieved typical results, if that gives you an idea of how strong this spring is.
Since most people aren't familiar with spring constants: 165 N/m means that it will take 165 Newtons of force (about 37 lbs) to displace the spring 1 meter. M30 said the displacement was 3 inches so the amount of force on the spring will add is 2.8 pounds when cocked.
Edited by Peter, 10 January 2008 - 05:59 PM.
#35
Posted 12 January 2008 - 08:16 AM
*cool mod stuff*
Thoughts?
I really like this design, primarily because it seems like you could easily remove the stock if you wanted to use the gun without it. I also like the idea that adding the stock adds range, making it more beneficial to convert the gun to the "rifle" configuration. Makes sense that the "rifle" should have more range than the "pistol".
Anyway, nice work. I do see your concern with the stock's locking mechanism, though, since it's just a tiny piece of plastic, but maybe if it was replaced with metal or something it would be stronger.
#36
Posted 15 January 2008 - 06:48 PM
First of all: The plunger tube on the recon fits perfectly into the plunger tube of a night finder. And the nightfinder plunger tube can fit into the RC stock with only a little dremeling.
Second thing: Taking out the air restrictor is EASY. A drill will get it done in not time flat, and it adds a good amount of range.
All in all, even though it *only* gets nightfinder ranges, it's a solid gun. With an extended clip, you've got 12 rapid mid range shots from a compact and comfortable gun, with an extra 6 in the stock. Add a tactical light and stick the "laser" on (it's got a tight enough beam for indoors) and you've got a fantastic defensive weapon for a HvZ game. (I imagine, I can't drum up enough people for a good game). I'm more than happy with this gun.
"Which road do I take?" she asked.
"Where do you want to go?" responded the Cheshire cat.
"I don't know," Alice answered.
"Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."
#37
Posted 16 January 2008 - 12:06 PM
Talio in Shoutbox.
#38
Posted 16 January 2008 - 12:30 PM
Edited by Squishy, 16 January 2008 - 12:47 PM.
We are the proud members of University of Maryland Nerf Activity Society, summer plans are:
Weekly games and summer Dart o' War.
WE LOVE OUTSIDE PLAYERS.
visit www.umdnerf.com for rules and forums or PM me for any questions. We always welcome outside players.
#39
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:19 PM
This (plus air restrictor removal) actually gave my recon more shooting power than my modified longshot (which has 2 extra springs but no air restrictor removed).
I was extremely surprised, and pleased.
I have yet to get a small piece of pvc to encage the spring behind the plunger tube, or else the spring jumps out everytime you shoot.
In summation, there is hope for this gun. And potential to be more powerful than a longshot!
Edited by smeagolsaur, 17 January 2008 - 01:21 PM.
#40
Posted 17 January 2008 - 11:51 PM
In summation, there is hope for this gun. And potential to be more powerful than a longshot!
A great nf can beat a crummy xbow...
Don't want to shove balls in tight spaces. Trust me, bad idea.
For sale: Vintage WWII French rifles. Dropped once, never fired.
#41
Posted 11 January 2009 - 11:06 AM
OR should I try finding a "lighter" spring. With the modification I am doing, I am increasing the distance the "breech block" (or what I am calling the breach block, the orange internal piece that slides back and forth) slides back, thereby increasing the amount of air in the chamber (which I am also replacing) so instead of the original 3.25" it slides back, it will slide back a total of about 5.5". So the spring needs to expand to push it forward that distance. I'm debating if the Spring I have now, or even an AR-15 Spring will be too difficult to compress that much and if I should try finding a smaller dia. wire size spring.
Does anyone know of a spring that would be say 6 or 7" when fully expanded to push a distance of 5.5" after being in its' compressed position?
Thanks very much!
ShadowTank.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users