
#1
Posted 05 July 2004 - 04:02 AM
#2
Posted 05 July 2004 - 05:13 AM
I don't quite know the termonology, but i think the baffle and bleed ports are what work. I think it was Zero, or someone being flamed by Zero, that designed a concept where you add an extra few inches onto the barrel, that has points drilled through it, and the entire barrel extension is wrapped in foam insulation so that the air slowly bleeds out. Hmmmm, bleed ports, so i was right.

i will mention again these are illegal
#3
Posted 05 July 2004 - 09:05 AM
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#4
Posted 05 July 2004 - 09:19 AM
If nerf guns were firearms you sure wouldn't be able to buy them under a certain age (depending on location)
A gun, pistol, or any weapon from a shot is discharged by the
force of an explosive substance, as gunpowder.
I don't know of a nerf gun using explosions, except maybe that baking soda +vinegar one.
Edited by crankymonky, 05 July 2004 - 09:22 AM.
#5
Posted 05 July 2004 - 10:47 AM
Just make your silencer anyway, cops aren't going to care. Besides, a silencer for a spring gun won't reduce the noise by even a decibel because the noise is made from the piston hitting the case, not air popping out. silencers for nerf = useless
What was that movie where a guy with a gun shot a clerk and used a 2 liter coke bottle to silence it. Are coke bottles illegal to carry around now? Mind you, a 2 liter would silence a firearm just as much as a homemade silencer would silence a nerf gun.
Edited by xedice, 05 July 2004 - 10:49 AM.
Doin' coke, drinkin' beers, Drinkin' beers beers beers
Rollin' fatties, Smokin' blunts
Who smokes the blunts? We smoke the blunts
-Jay
#6
Posted 05 July 2004 - 01:21 PM
reduces noise slightly and eliminates rining, but most of my firing noise is still the 'thwop' of the compressed air behind the dart expanding rapidly out of the muzzle.
my first barrel was ported, and had a PVC sleeve around it that was ported as well in an attempt to bleed the air off, but it didnt do a whole lot.
that barrel was 1" long screwed into the stock LnL barrel to fit the OD of micros, so it clearly had other issues. it was a first mod and an attempt to keep the pneumatics as close to their original condition as possible. ive since taken a hacksaw to them.
ice nine, calm. im not a n00b, just new to this particular board. don't worry.
but thank you for the link.
Edited by okto, 05 July 2004 - 01:22 PM.
#7
Posted 05 July 2004 - 08:29 PM
I hopped into bed that night, and thought "FARK, detachable sileners are illegal

I like your concept of silencing the internals, sounds good.
Good luck, hope i helped.
#8
Posted 05 July 2004 - 11:34 PM
taita_cakes, on Jul 5 2004, 02:13 AM, said:
Did I flame a guy for porting his barrel? I don't remember doing that... I rarely flame designs, I usually just construct criticism and add suggestions....I think it was Zero, or someone being flamed by Zero, that designed a concept where you add an extra few inches onto the barrel, that has points drilled through it, and the entire barrel extension is wrapped in foam insulation so that the air slowly bleeds out. Hmmmm, bleed ports, so i was right.
Best way to ensure that friction is not increased by the ported holes (since many darts are placed in barrels under a bit of compression) is to use a slightly larger size of piping for the ported part, either with the SDR-11 version of your PVC, a size up in brass, or just by enlarging the inner barrel with a slightly larger drill bit or with a dremel. Sure, it's not as effective, but I just wouldn't trust drilled holes with the side of closed-cell foam too well. Frayed, you know?
[Just to toss on again, sorry if I come off as insulting when I criticize ideas; that's not the intention at all.]
Edited by Zero Talent, 05 July 2004 - 11:42 PM.
- Death
#9
Posted 05 July 2004 - 11:51 PM
Anyway, i suggest the earlier method. I couldn't remember whether it was you, Zero, who created it, or more memorably, you, who prove the theory wrong.
Basic Physics would say that design works very well...
#10
Posted 06 July 2004 - 12:07 AM
so i tried removing the closed-cell and wrapped a sock around the riddled-with-holes CPVC and fired a couple test shots. slight reduction in noise, but not significant :/
so it comes down to finding a good baffling material, i think. logically it has to work: noise caused by rapid expansion of compressed air out the muzzle can be reduced by contained dissipation and deceleration of said air.
#11
Posted 06 July 2004 - 12:17 AM
okto said
Budda-Bing. Have a dollar.so it comes down to finding a good baffling material, i think. logically it has to work: noise caused by rapid expansion of compressed air out the muzzle can be reduced by contained dissipation and deceleration of said air.
#12
Posted 06 July 2004 - 12:30 AM
#13
Posted 06 July 2004 - 12:33 AM
Maybe he should try hundreds of minute holes with the smallest drill bit he's got, and then not wrap it with foam insulation/layers.
#14
Posted 06 July 2004 - 11:02 AM
#15
Posted 06 July 2004 - 08:34 PM
(A9) Q. Are Paintball and/or Airgun Sound Suppressers legal? [Back]
A. §921(a)(24) The terms "firearm silencer" and "firearm muffler" mean any device for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm, including any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for use in assembling or fabricating a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, and any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.
Numerous paintball silencers tested by the Firearms Technology Branch have been determined to be, by nature of their design and function, firearm silencers as defined in 18 U.S.C., Section 921(a)(24). An individual wishing to manufacturer a firearm silencer must receive prior approval from ATF by submitting an ATF Form 1 and paying a $200 making tax.
Now all you have to do is figure out whether or not a Nerf gun is classified as a firearm.
#16
Posted 06 July 2004 - 09:26 PM
As I've stated many times, the full ATF definition of a silencer does not require that it is made for a firearm, but that it could be used on a firearm. Unfortunately, that is rather open to interpretation by local law enforcement.
#17
Posted 07 July 2004 - 04:16 AM
You'd expect PVC to melt pretty fast under all that heat and pressure.
Either way, i don't nerf in public, so it's not like i can get caught with a silencer. Not that i'm condoning it. I'm just glad we don't have little miss morals over here, as well as NHQ. *phew*.
Any chance of getting some microphone recordings of these silenced shots? Compared to unsilenced?
EDIT: Congrats on the 1900 posts cx.
Edited by taita_cakes, 07 July 2004 - 04:18 AM.
#18
Posted 07 July 2004 - 03:50 PM

and thanks for the dollar.
so, decelerating air...ive been musing. as the dart leaves the muzzle, the air compressed in the barrel expands rapidly outward, as the tail end of the dart will prevent the majority of it from going forward. probably some turbulence from the compressed air in the dart (i hollow mine out nerf-style), but i think that can be mostly ignored. so venting it outward right at the muzzle should reduce the noise by the greatest factor, rather than setting up a pressure wave down the silencer tube. i drilled as many more holes as i think the CPVC can withstand structurally right at the muzzle, but it still doesnt seem to be having a great effect. i wonder if a stepped series of progressively larger tubes, like so:
vents ___ __ _____________________ |_____________ |PVC tube 2 ______| |PVC tube 1 | | | | | muzzle | | | | | ______| | | |____________| | |__ __ ____________________|
etc, so that the inner PVC tube's "muzzle" has room around and behind it for air to expand into and be vented out laterally, et caetera ad infinitum. wrap the whole thing in felt or whatever to muffle it even more.
thoughts?
Edited by okto, 07 July 2004 - 04:30 PM.
#19
Posted 07 July 2004 - 03:50 PM
#20
Posted 07 July 2004 - 04:06 PM
how many of these airsoft silencer lookalikes are actually designed to dissipate muzzle air? ive seen them too, and its usually just a piece of PVC fitted over the barrel. that actually makes the muzzle blast louder. it confines the air to the cylinder formed by the inside of the PVC, and sets up a pressure wave down the tube, pushing the unmoving air in the tube ahead of it, and usually inducing some harmonic resonance in the tube, similarly to a flute only higher pressure and not sustained.
that wasnt supposed to be a flame, hopefully nobody get their toes stepped on. if so, apologies in advance.
#21
Posted 07 July 2004 - 09:40 PM

Anyhow,
taita_cakes said
Definetly good idea. I stuck a muzzle brake (very similar to what was mentioned, only bigger holes [3/8"], and three slits mounted in a triangular fasion, all of which were 1/4" by 1/2") on the end of my supersoaker barrel, took about half the decibels off. Then again, the barrel is 15/32" leading to 17/32", followed by a connector that is 5/8", which finally leads to the 3/4" PVC ported muzzle brake, which means air may have escaped somewhere in there, although I highly doubt it cause my darts expand to the diameter of the barrel. By the way, those were all the ID of the things mentioned.Maybe he should try hundreds of minute holes with the smallest drill bit he's got, and then not wrap it with foam insulation/layers.
#22
Posted 07 July 2004 - 11:25 PM
after more experimentation the answer is BIG hole(s) right at the muzzle, with some dissipative material covering them. this has the unforeseen pleasant side effect of increasing my RoF by allowing my to insert a new dart without removing the entire silencer. this reduces the muzzle noise to more of a soft "thwip", and has made it apparent that my job of silencing the internals wasn't as well done as i thought--most of the noise was actually the piston and spring, the muzzle noise was just the most obvious noise.
#23
Posted 08 July 2004 - 05:19 AM
General Primape said
Anyhow,
taita_cakes said
Maybe he should try hundreds of minute holes with the smallest drill bit he's got, and then not wrap it with foam insulation/layers.
Definetly good idea. I stuck a muzzle brake (very similar to what was mentioned, only bigger holes [3/8"], and three slits mounted in a triangular fasion, all of which were 1/4" by 1/2") on the end of my supersoaker barrel, took about half the decibels off. Then again, the barrel is 15/32" leading to 17/32", followed by a connector that is 5/8", which finally leads to the 3/4" PVC ported muzzle brake, which means air may have escaped somewhere in there, although I highly doubt it cause my darts expand to the diameter of the barrel. By the way, those were all the ID of the things mentioned.
Thank you, and thank you for some exact measurements. But i think a thin layer of felt/foam/material would be required to control the speed of the air dissepating. And anyway, maybe your gun, has infact, reached its most silent form *DUN-DUN-DUHHHNNNN*
#24
Posted 08 July 2004 - 05:27 AM
Quote
nooooo! it needs to be quieter!maybe your gun, has infact, reached its most silent form *DUN-DUN-DUHHHNNNN*
anyway, as it stands i have a 6" length of 1/2" CPVC, with a 2.5" x 3/4" slot cut in right at the muzzle, and a piece of pipe insulation over the lot. from holding the gun and firing it, all i her is spring noise, no pop.
so next step is i'm replacing the piston and cocking lever with something stronger, to minimize breakage (and allow me to adopt a design more suited to silencing), reinforce the spring retention wall, get a bigger spring, and rebarrel.
so basically, the totally unnecessary portion is done, and now i only have to do all the important bits

#25
Posted 08 July 2004 - 05:30 AM
This is sounding like an extra cool gun. I'm going on a quest to find a LNL now. Then, let the fun begin.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users