New Raider CS-35 Speculation Thread
#376
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:24 PM
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?
#377
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
To rephrase - You AMERICANS will get it either the same time, or maybe a bit early.
And Schizo, I agree with your stock comment. I will be throwing it in my box of bits as soon as it arrives.
#378
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:43 PM
Hey, don't blame me. I assumed that's what you colloquially known as. My apologies if it's not so.
To rephrase - You AMERICANS will get it either the same time, or maybe a bit early.
And Schizo, I agree with your stock comment. I will be throwing it in my box of bits as soon as it arrives.
As a yankee (both continentally and globally) living in a southern state that borders Texas, I say, don't mind him... Texans have issues, which is why they claim everything is bigger and why they have such a hard time getting along with others
http://datafortress2020.110mb.com/
#379
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:51 PM
Hey, don't blame me. I assumed that's what you colloquially known as. My apologies if it's not so.
No blame, I was explaining. What you said wasn't rude or anything.
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?
#380
Posted 10 May 2009 - 06:57 PM
Hey, don't blame me. I assumed that's what you colloquially known as. My apologies if it's not so.
No blame, I was explaining. What you said wasn't rude or anything.
That's alright then.
Back on topic - The paint scheme.
Does anyone think they will actually make the digital camo properly? Or am I gonna have to paint it on?
Also, I wonder if they might do a red and black one, like the new recon (ps - can someone please post a pic of that please!)
#381
Posted 10 May 2009 - 07:01 PM
The "digi-camo" just looks like they made random squares on the shell have a rougher texture. You can see it in a few pictures people have posted.That's alright then.
Back on topic - The paint scheme.
Does anyone think they will actually make the digital camo properly? Or am I gonna have to paint it on?
Also, I wonder if they might do a red and black one, like the new recon (ps - can someone please post a pic of that please!)
And don't worry, nobody besides that guy cares if you say yanks.
EDIT- check pics 7&8 in the first post to see what I'm talking about.
Edited by umpshaplapa, 10 May 2009 - 07:03 PM.
#382
Posted 10 May 2009 - 08:00 PM
The "digi-camo" just looks like they made random squares on the shell have a rougher texture. You can see it in a few pictures people have posted.That's alright then.
Back on topic - The paint scheme.
Does anyone think they will actually make the digital camo properly? Or am I gonna have to paint it on?
Also, I wonder if they might do a red and black one, like the new recon (ps - can someone please post a pic of that please!)
And don't worry, nobody besides that guy cares if you say yanks.
EDIT- check pics 7&8 in the first post to see what I'm talking about.
I wondering if it's like that because it may be the prototype. The one for the shows that isn't quite finished?
The possibilities....
#383
Posted 10 May 2009 - 08:07 PM
The "digi-camo" just looks like they made random squares on the shell have a rougher texture. You can see it in a few pictures people have posted.That's alright then.
Back on topic - The paint scheme.
Does anyone think they will actually make the digital camo properly? Or am I gonna have to paint it on?
Also, I wonder if they might do a red and black one, like the new recon (ps - can someone please post a pic of that please!)
And don't worry, nobody besides that guy cares if you say yanks.
EDIT- check pics 7&8 in the first post to see what I'm talking about.
I wondering if it's like that because it may be the prototype. The one for the shows that isn't quite finished?
The possibilities....
Probably somewhat like the vulcan box that has a (not very, but noticable) different paintjob.
#384
Posted 10 May 2009 - 08:48 PM
#385
Posted 10 May 2009 - 10:21 PM
You're, what, the 20th person to publically state this?Personally I think this gun is going to be pretty good. Anyway, even if is bad then we still can scrap it for parts and the drum mag. I think Nerf is making guns these days look cooler, have better stock ranges, and less modability. This one looks like it has a lot of potential.
Yes, the guns look cooler. Yes, their modification capabilities are low. However, their stock ranges suck. We saw the video. That dart dropped almost immediately.
I, myself, coined it,
"The more badass it looks, the more it sucks."
(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)
Every size rod you could ever want.
#386
Posted 11 May 2009 - 06:12 AM
And the grammar sure doesn't be flocking to yours. Shape up, please. It's hard to read when you don't know where a sentence ends and where it begins. I'm saying this for my own personal benefit. Speak English, for God's sake.Snippet
nature must have been kind to this guy;s body cause the ladies sure as hell aint flocking to his brain
Sorry, the lack of brain must have rubbed off on me. It's infectious, you know!
back to proper speculation:
The prospect of painted camo is a very distinct one, but I wouldn't dare call it probable. If recall correctly the box labels the dartgun as the CS-35 RAIDER, while the barrel marking still carries the CS-6 designation. One or the other is likely to change, simply for consistancy. I've seen companies go with texture alone, and I've also seen some go the with multi-color treatment on thier products wehre it wasn't "neccisary". One would hope for proper 3 color camo, even if its a color scheme that is completely useless as camo.
meanwhile back on the ranch:
I do, as a man that has lived on both sides of the Mason-Dixon, find the term "Yank" a bit offensive, for a couple reasons. One is the obvious geographical relevance of it. Another is an often forgotten aspect of theAmerican Civil War, which was the battle over a member state of the union's right to self determination, a right I personally believe should be upheld. Yet another reason is a difference in attitudes, something you could only really experience for yourself. Then again, the whole affair is much like calling a Scotsman a "limey". It's simply inaccurate on such a level as to be comical.
Having done my share of travelling I've returned to Texas by choice.
@MC Hey how far from the gulf coast are ya?
Why so serious?
#387
Posted 11 May 2009 - 05:09 PM
Isn't that what's happened to all the blue N-Strikes so far? Even the Longshot's getting yellow treatment.
The digital camo'll likely just be the texture, although one must realize that different textures appear differently in the light. They have different reflections of whatever light hits them, so you'd get a glare for your camouflage.
Genius, isn't it.
(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)
Every size rod you could ever want.
#388
Posted 11 May 2009 - 09:36 PM
"The more badass it looks, the more it sucks."
That's not true in any way.
(Unofficial) Wii thread
Damn it Foamfoot. Why is it that you kill every good topic with a retarded response a few days late.
#389
Posted 12 May 2009 - 06:40 AM
#390
Posted 12 May 2009 - 04:37 PM
How so?"The more badass it looks, the more it sucks."
That's not true in any way.
The Recon looks pretty cool, yet it has horrid performance.
The yellow Longshot looks better than its blue variant, but it still manages to suck.
The Vulcan looks amazingly badass and intimidating, even (So far as a Nerf gun can), but it has the most issues I've ever experienced.
Maverick. That's all I have to say about that one.
And we all saw the video for this badass-looking mother. Those darts were dropping at 15 feet, maximum.
I mean, I'm definitely gonna get it for indoor warfare, but I wouldn't dare take it outside.
(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)
Every size rod you could ever want.
#391
Posted 12 May 2009 - 05:06 PM
How so?"The more badass it looks, the more it sucks."
That's not true in any way.
The Recon looks pretty cool, yet it has horrid performance.
The yellow Longshot looks better than its blue variant, but it still manages to suck.
The Vulcan looks amazingly badass and intimidating, even (So far as a Nerf gun can), but it has the most issues I've ever experienced.
Maverick. That's all I have to say about that one.
And we all saw the video for this badass-looking mother. Those darts were dropping at 15 feet, maximum.
I mean, I'm definitely gonna get it for indoor warfare, but I wouldn't dare take it outside.
I don't think it's just dropping I'm pretty sure that it's bouncing off the wall or whatever the kid was shooting at.
#392
Posted 12 May 2009 - 06:07 PM
#393
Posted 12 May 2009 - 06:59 PM
Those are all opinions (which guns look cool) which are not even close to being universal. How a gun looks has absolutely nothing to do with it's performance, one way or the other. Crossbow, titan, nitefinder, and SSII.How so?"The more badass it looks, the more it sucks."
That's not true in any way.
The Recon looks pretty cool, yet it has horrid performance.
The yellow Longshot looks better than its blue variant, but it still manages to suck.
The Vulcan looks amazingly badass and intimidating, even (So far as a Nerf gun can), but it has the most issues I've ever experienced.
Maverick. That's all I have to say about that one.
Let's take this to PMs.
Edited by Foamfoot, 12 May 2009 - 07:00 PM.
(Unofficial) Wii thread
Damn it Foamfoot. Why is it that you kill every good topic with a retarded response a few days late.
#395
Posted 12 May 2009 - 07:59 PM
That's friggin' awesome, but too bad it uses streamlines...
It uses a clip and a breech.... How was it not going to use streamlines? And to you not use stefans?
Edited by Draconis, 12 May 2009 - 07:59 PM.
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?
#396
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:12 PM
That's friggin' awesome, but too bad it uses streamlines...
It uses a clip and a breech.... How was it not going to use streamlines? And to you not use stefans?
Maybe it doesn't have a breech(insert creepy alien sounds). No I am just joking and Zachfrog Friggin really you couldn't had just said freaking.
#397
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:18 PM
Maybe it doesn't have a breech(insert creepy alien sounds). No I am just joking and Zachfrog Friggin really you couldn't had just said freaking.
What the fuck did you just say?
(Unofficial) Wii thread
Damn it Foamfoot. Why is it that you kill every good topic with a retarded response a few days late.
#398
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:22 PM
Maybe it doesn't have a breech(insert creepy alien sounds). No I am just joking and Zachfrog Friggin really you couldn't had just said freaking.
What the fuck did you just say?
I said jokingly Maybe it doesn't have a breech. And then told Zachfrog to use proper words.
#400
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:58 PM
Let's just agree that any springer made since 2006 has pretty much sucked.
Agreed.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users