zaphodB, on Sep 25 2008, 01:43 AM, said:
I guarantee you that the hotglue won't cool by the time it falls out of the tube.
Thank you for that completely useless comment.
If you have something helpful to offer, please add it, if not, don't post.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:05 AM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:07 AM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:37 AM
bobafan, on Sep 25 2008, 10:07 AM, said:
Alright. One of you got me thinking.
I have an idea for the dome creation problem.
You have a bicycle chain or something similar act at as a conveyor. Have the chain be on it's sideand on every other link or so, have a small cup the shape of the dome.(you could use a drill bit to make the holes) You would still need an automated hot glue gun and the weights need to be the blank already. The darts start out already weighted, so they should be naturally standing up. First, the hot glue dispenser puts hot glue in the mold. Second, A dart is placed on the glue which is still hot. (you lego mindstorms to make an automated arm or some other method to do this) The chain continues around and when the glue cools, the darts are kicked off by some sort of rotating mechanism.
I will make a sketch and test out the mold idea when I get back from class. It is hard to draw on a laptop touchpad and I don't carry blocks of steel and a drill press around with me.
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 10:05 AM, said:
Can you fix your picture? I had figured out a problem or two with your design and I was going to tell you but now I can't remember. Honestly, I would still stick with my design if I were you. No timing issues and minimal movements.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:46 AM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:52 AM
zaphodB, on Sep 25 2008, 01:43 AM, said:
I haven't quite figured this part out to numbers yet. No one said the conveyor had to be really short. There I'll try to get an idea for the conveyor drawn up for you guys. What I'm working on is that they will be fully completed by the time they drop out. The conveyor is a loose term there. I'm planning on having an individual dart grabbed by an arm while it is vertical. The arms will be on the conveyor. It won't be a standard flat conveyor. It will be on its side.I guarantee you that the hotglue won't cool by the time it falls out of the tube.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:17 AM
aetherguy881, on Sep 25 2008, 10:52 AM, said:
zaphodB, on Sep 25 2008, 01:43 AM, said:
I haven't quite figured this part out to numbers yet. No one said the conveyor had to be really short. There I'll try to get an idea for the conveyor drawn up for you guys. What I'm working on is that they will be fully completed by the time they drop out. The conveyor is a loose term there. I'm planning on having an individual dart grabbed by an arm while it is vertical. The arms will be on the conveyor. It won't be a standard flat conveyor. It will be on its side.I guarantee you that the hotglue won't cool by the time it falls out of the tube.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:32 AM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:37 AM
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 10:46 AM, said:
Alright now that it's back up I figured out your problem. When the dart falls in front of the push block it's going to have a lot of momentum and will fall over. I see you have a slant there, but it could either fall onto the slant or fall forward. It will only take one out of the hundreds of blanks this thing will cut to jam up everything.
I solved this in mine with the wedge that moves on the perpendicular axis, but I have an even simpler solution now. Make the push block solid, with a hole bigger than a stefan running all the way through it. It has to have a bottom track, but it also means no side tracks are needed. When the block is back, a blank drops in and stops on the bottom track. The block moves forward and the hole lines up under the tube. This allows for size tolerances not dictated by the dart size. Just make the block's stroke bigger if you need more room to work.
The block is now forward and the hole is over the cooling tube, separated from each other by a sliding door that has to be flush with the bottom of the push block. The push block will hold the blank steady as the weight and glue are dropped in. Door opens, dart cools and is done.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:04 PM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:57 PM
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 01:04 PM, said:
How the hell would the dart fall forward? It's in a tube basically. And if you want to make different size stefans, just make inserts. You should have started something by now me thinks. Or at least run the ideas by your dad to see what he can come up with circuit wise.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:31 PM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:39 PM
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 03:31 PM, said:
It wouldn't fall over because it's in a tube. How do you fall over if you're held up on every side.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:09 PM
hereticorp, on Sep 25 2008, 03:39 PM, said:
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 03:31 PM, said:
It wouldn't fall over because it's in a tube. How do you fall over if you're held up on every side.
So instead of a pushblock with a tooth in front of it, you want a tube that's somehow both tight enough to hold the blank in place and loose enough for the blank to fall in without snagging and fall out equally without snagging?
I think a groove/tooth setup makes more sense at that point.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:18 PM
Splitlip, on Sep 25 2008, 04:09 PM, said:
Are you being serious? Ever notice how many sizes brass comes in? Ta da. Why would it snag anyway? It's closed cell foam. The outside has very little friction. That's why we use it in barrels. I really don't know what planet you're on right now. You have the blank cutting in a tube that holds in straight enough then lets it go. Seriously I think you're just trying to show me up for some reason.
And as for the groove and tooth setup, while it works, it's triple as much work, and involves a lot of timing and spacing, whereas a block that takes it from the cutter to the weights is just a stop and start. Do what you want.
You'll kill yourself trying to get the parts for it. I'm a big advocate of having a plan, but for something like this you can't cast every piece exactly how you need it. You need a plan for materials and a plan for how it can all be assembled. The push block can easily be a hunk of wood, but what about a tooth wedge? Wood, maybe, but it will need to be finished off, adding tons of work and measuring (added thickness from the finishing products after getting it into the proper shape).
Edited by hereticorp, 25 September 2008 - 03:18 PM.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:16 PM
Just Some Bob, on Sep 25 2008, 04:49 PM, said:
If you've thought of multiple ways to do a task, and there's no definite means of choosing between them, build the one which you think is simplest and fastest to get built.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 07:39 PM
Posted 26 September 2008 - 08:11 AM
minsc, on Sep 25 2008, 08:39 PM, said:
Hey guys, I've been reading this topic for a while now. Anyways, I was wondering if something like this would help:
Basically, it would be like cutting x number of pieces instead of one at a time. The blue piece at the end would either be a pressure sensor to trigger a stop of feeding, or just a stopping plate for manual use. Hope this helps.
First post woo.
Edited by hereticorp, 26 September 2008 - 08:12 AM.
Posted 29 September 2008 - 02:39 PM
Posted 29 September 2008 - 03:35 PM
Splitlip, on Sep 29 2008, 03:39 PM, said:
So how'd it go?
Posted 12 October 2008 - 06:08 PM
Youtube
LS and Retaliator boltsleds are currently available at https://www.facebook.com/RoboM8/
Posted 12 October 2008 - 07:33 PM
Edited by Lucian, 12 October 2008 - 07:40 PM.
Contact me for design consultation relating to 3D Printing, CNC Machining, and Laser Cutting. I am always happy to collaborate on viable Open Source projects and/or business ventures.
Posted 12 October 2008 - 08:46 PM
Lucian, on Oct 12 2008, 08:33 PM, said:
Since this thread just got bumped I thought it would be fun to spend 15 minutes working on a weight adding system (sp?), I know it won't work but I might as well show it to contribute possible ideas. I would also like to know how good this idea could work, so please criticize
roboman, on Oct 12 2008, 07:08 PM, said:
You should use one of these for your control system. I've been using them for a few years now, and they are really easy to program, and have 16 I/O pins. Also, you could use servos as your actuators.
Posted 03 April 2009 - 04:54 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users