#26
Posted 31 October 2004 - 10:58 AM
BRING BUNGIE BACK!!
#27
Posted 31 October 2004 - 11:28 AM
See, that is from a point of view of a guy who hates Halo. Let me assess your review from the point of view of a hardcore Halo fan.more directly on topic: Halo 2 is not that good. i've played a leak: same engine, same style of play, slightly upgraded weapons, no better storyline. it's not even a good enough update to be a worthwhile expansion pack.
Same engine: It's a sequel. What do you expect?
Same style of play: It's a sequel. Were still playing the same game. No reason to turn it into an RPG.
Slightly upgraded weapons: Its a sequel. Fixed some old weapons and added some weapons. It isn't a different game so they don't really need different weapons.
No better storyline: The storyline is perfectly fine, as it was in Halo 1. In fact, you don't need a storyline at all beaucse you are just there to kill shit.
Not even a good enough update to be a worthwile expansion pack: Its not an update or expansion pack. It's a whole other game. I don't quite understand what you are trying to say with this sentance.
Yay Bungie.
#28
Posted 31 October 2004 - 11:38 AM
#29
Posted 31 October 2004 - 12:05 PM
Doin' coke, drinkin' beers, Drinkin' beers beers beers
Rollin' fatties, Smokin' blunts
Who smokes the blunts? We smoke the blunts
-Jay
#30
Posted 31 October 2004 - 02:12 PM
~ompa
#31
Posted 31 October 2004 - 02:13 PM
that's my point. a new game should have, you know, new shit. this one doesn't, and my point was that this is not enough new material to make for an expansion pack for the same game, let alone releasing it as a standalone for full game price. it's little more than new levels and weapon mods.Not even a good enough update to be a worthwile expansion pack: Its not an update or expansion pack. It's a whole other game. I don't quite understand what you are trying to say with this sentance.
on mac/pc release: bungie said they were releasing it for PC, but the code didn't exist. they were planning to port it at some point, but it was developed on Mac.
#32
Posted 31 October 2004 - 02:38 PM
#33
Posted 31 October 2004 - 03:19 PM
#34
Posted 31 October 2004 - 03:35 PM
that's my point. a new game should have, you know, new shit.
Fully agreed.
Sadly, this is a sequel, so it's not necessarily a new game. Why change the aspects of a game if it already sells so well, and has so many good reviews to it? Just throw in a few new weapons, levels, and poof, you have a sequel. It's not meant to be a "new game" as you put it, but a sequel to the original Halo. If they would have changed too much, I would have been pissed.
I think the arguement here stems from the difference between whether Halo 2 is supposed to be a "new game" or a "sequel". I suggest stating which you think it is before voicing your opinions, in order to avoid arguing over something when all of you have different base definitions.
I say it's a sequel.
~ompa
#35
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:25 PM
How exactly did you play the leak. I know that it was an .iso file, but how would you get it to play on xbox? Or even computer? Sorry I do not know very much about this sort of thing.BULLSHIT!! it was originally made for Macintosh, as the fourth chapter in the unbelievably underappreciated Marathon series, until M$ bought Bungie out.Yeah thats true, but you have to consider that halo 1 was originally made for PC.
more directly on topic: Halo 2 is not that good. i've played a leak: same engine, same style of play, slightly upgraded weapons, no better storyline. it's not even a good enough update to be a worthwhile expansion pack.
Microsoft can't bloody develop things. all they can do is buy, steal, and repackage in a crippled form. halo is unfortunately no exception.
RIP Bungie.
#36
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:28 PM
Call me NSF
N erf
S pecial
F orces
#37
Posted 31 October 2004 - 06:35 PM
#38
Posted 31 October 2004 - 07:25 PM
#39
Posted 31 October 2004 - 07:56 PM
#40
Posted 31 October 2004 - 08:41 PM
Oh yeah, 9 more days.
Edited by duce, 31 October 2004 - 08:43 PM.
#41
Posted 31 October 2004 - 11:42 PM
but still, it's not very far away. I did play it, pretty kickass, and worth buying.
#42
Posted 01 November 2004 - 03:16 PM
Assuming that I play it and find it interesting, I'll go out and buy it. But I really don't see how much of a difference they could make in gameplay if it's the same engine. So they have new guns, cool. Not that exciting. They have new levels. Could be exciting, we're yet to see. They have a new storyline. Assuming it's original, and well-written, it could be good. Otherwise, nothing. The graphics don't look any different than they did on the original Halo.
However, I have seen videos and some reviews for HL2, and had the chance to play it for a few minutes at a friend's house, and I will say right now that I will go out to Best Buy as soon as I get a chance and I will buy the first un-opened copy I see.
You are now free to insult my thinking.
#43
Posted 01 November 2004 - 03:45 PM
http://www.gamespot....s.html?page=172
http://www.gamespot....ns.html?page=73
I tried to get as similar pics as possible. I don't know about you but that looks like a nice improvement.
#44
Posted 01 November 2004 - 06:54 PM
#45
Posted 02 November 2004 - 02:45 AM
You know guys, if you have downlaoded the leak of H2 I wouldn't be talking about it on here....or anywhere.
As long as no one posts a direct link or any other direct information on finding a download of the leak, I don't see a problem with it. That is at least the rule enforced on many game system modding/hacking sites and forums. The leak exists, and some people have copies of it. End of story. Besides, the leak is in French, and can only be played on modded X-boxes, so I don't think many of us would really bother getting it anyway.
I wasn't too excited about Doom 3 when it came out. One of my friends bought a copy and it was lagging pretty bad when playing online on his brand new Dell. I feel more excited about Halo 2 because it would be interesting to see some of the new shit they threw in. I haven't seen many shooters where you can dual-wield weapons.....
Edited by Oroku_Saki, 02 November 2004 - 02:51 AM.
#46
Posted 02 November 2004 - 08:35 PM
#47
Posted 02 November 2004 - 11:33 PM
#48
Posted 03 November 2004 - 11:29 AM
Where did you hear that? Its nice, but it is definitely not better than any game out. It also looks better in screenshots than in acutal play (the leaked vesion is all over my friend's dorm at GA Tech).In most its even better than that. You can now destroy objects and it has a lighting engine superior to splinter cell, or in fact any game out yet.
#49
Posted 03 November 2004 - 11:37 AM
#50
Posted 03 November 2004 - 02:11 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users