It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.
I wish I could sig that...
Posted 17 February 2009 - 03:17 PM
It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 03:48 PM
Posted 17 February 2009 - 04:07 PM
It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.
I wish I could sig that...
Posted 17 February 2009 - 04:14 PM
It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 05:21 PM
If someone can name me 3 solid examples of how, say, the 100 page vulcan speculation nightmare actually proved useful, I'll consider not shutting this down before it becomes any more of an eyesore.
How is he being grouchy? He is 100% right, speculation threads accomplish nothing. Wait for the gun to hit shelves, then check it out.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 05:39 PM
Posted 17 February 2009 - 06:27 PM
Posted 17 February 2009 - 07:08 PM
This thread does not contain any new ideas.Some of the speculation on how things might work, when they turned out not to be the case, inspired modders to try those things for themselves anyway.
Not "examples" I know.
Still, New ideas --> good.
Edited by CaptainSlug, 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM
Edited by foxdemon82, 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 08:05 PM
This thread does not contain any new ideas.Some of the speculation on how things might work, when they turned out not to be the case, inspired modders to try those things for themselves anyway.
Not "examples" I know.
Still, New ideas --> good.
You are arguing that speculation, conjecture, and theory threads have somehow added to this hobby in a tangible way. I cannot disagree more.
If such threads are left to grow, in my experience the opposite is true. People end up spending time arguing/posturing in threads about what will or will not work instead of running practical experiments. Ideas/theories are WORTHLESS if they're not tested. This is why design threads are discouraged.
This kind of thread however is even more pointless, because you're arguing about how something that already exists functions. What is the point in doing so? Bragging rights that your theory was correct?
You will only be able to find out for sure when the product hits the shelves. And then you may discover that you may have wasted a load of time since the images you spent so much time over-interpreting were in fact those of a demonstrational prototype that didn't reach mass-production in exactly the same form.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 09:54 PM
Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:30 PM
But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.In response to all the "it fires when the handle is forward", I had an epiphany today.
It's only coincidence that it does that.
When you prime the plunger, normally, it hits a catch. Well, if you hold down the trigger, the catch is non-existant. From there, it's like a ratchet: It goes over the pump handle the one way, and when you pull back, it's caught for the full stroke.
Just speculation, but it would seem to be a new idea...
And, to VACC, I wasn't here during the Vulcan craze, so don't kill me, please?
Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:31 PM
But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:50 PM
Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:51 PM
Touché.But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.
The Nerf Bow N Arrow.
Edited by Salmon, 17 February 2009 - 11:51 PM.
Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:55 PM
Touché.But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.
The Nerf Bow N Arrow.
So, a pull-and-release kind of thing.
I can see that.
Couldn't be very accurate though...
Posted 18 February 2009 - 12:55 PM
Posted 18 February 2009 - 03:37 PM
Posted 18 February 2009 - 03:37 PM
You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.
Posted 18 February 2009 - 09:59 PM
Posted 19 February 2009 - 10:56 AM
Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:04 AM
You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.
It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...
Who knows.
Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:56 AM
I doubt there are two triggers. The forward handle doesn't look like it has one.You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.
It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...
Who knows.
Nobody knows, and nobody will know until they actually see the internals of the gun. But I think I have an idea. I believe it was briefly mentioned earlier in the thread, but not in detail. There could be some form of "trigger" towards the front of the gun. Therefore, there would be two triggers that have to be depressed in order to fire the weapon. This fits, because in regular single fire mode, the handle would have to be all the way forward in order to pull the trigger. This could be because pushing it forward activiates that other trigger. Once it's forward, you can pull the main trigger to fire. However, in slam fire, since the first trigger is held down, you only have one to deal with, and when you slide the handle forward, it fires the gun. This could mean two catches, or some form of two stage catch. But like many others have said in the thread, nobody will no exactly until they actually have the gun in their hands, no matter how much speculation there is.
Posted 19 February 2009 - 12:06 PM
I doubt there are two triggers. The forward handle doesn't look like it has one.You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.
It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...
Who knows.
Nobody knows, and nobody will know until they actually see the internals of the gun. But I think I have an idea. I believe it was briefly mentioned earlier in the thread, but not in detail. There could be some form of "trigger" towards the front of the gun. Therefore, there would be two triggers that have to be depressed in order to fire the weapon. This fits, because in regular single fire mode, the handle would have to be all the way forward in order to pull the trigger. This could be because pushing it forward activiates that other trigger. Once it's forward, you can pull the main trigger to fire. However, in slam fire, since the first trigger is held down, you only have one to deal with, and when you slide the handle forward, it fires the gun. This could mean two catches, or some form of two stage catch. But like many others have said in the thread, nobody will no exactly until they actually have the gun in their hands, no matter how much speculation there is.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users