Jump to content


Photo

New Raider CS-35 Speculation Thread

Pictures & Video. DISCUSS HERE ONLY.

450 replies to this topic

#151 sputnik

sputnik

    Member

  • Members
  • 911 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 03:17 PM

It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.



I wish I could sig that...
  • 0
tcambre on IRC.

<3

#152 VACC

VACC

    Vacc is Legend

  • Founders
  • 3,265 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 03:48 PM

Seriously, this is what you people are doing with your time? If someone can name me 3 solid examples of how, say, the 100 page vulcan speculation nightmare actually proved useful, I'll consider not shutting this down before it becomes any more of an eyesore.
  • 0

#153 slowguitarman

slowguitarman

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,113 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 04:07 PM

It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.



I wish I could sig that...


Totally siggified.
  • 0
QUOTE
Your dreams were tight like a baby

SGM's Shred Shop -Mod Service

NerfHaven's resident drama queen.

#154 shadowkid33

shadowkid33

    Member

  • Members
  • 633 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 04:14 PM

It's probably laundry day at Slug's house, and all that was left in the dresser were the grouchy pants.


How is he being grouchy? He is 100% right, speculation threads accomplish nothing. Wait for the gun to hit shelves, then check it out.
  • 0
QUOTE
how the heck do you make a double clip?

QUOTE
Here are the steps.
1. Go to the search button in the right corner of the screen
2. Click
3. Search double longshot clip.

QUOTE
i dont have time, jeez, im new here!

#155 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 05:21 PM

If someone can name me 3 solid examples of how, say, the 100 page vulcan speculation nightmare actually proved useful, I'll consider not shutting this down before it becomes any more of an eyesore.


It keeps the new kids occupied, when they would otherwise be asking for help fixing their SSPBs. If the thread even falls to the second page, then we have new threads popping up with "OMG New GUNZ!". It's certainly not productive in any stretch of the imagination, but it cuts down on all the rest of the crap, and keeps all of the information everyone WANTS to see in one place.


How is he being grouchy? He is 100% right, speculation threads accomplish nothing. Wait for the gun to hit shelves, then check it out.


We are all aware of that. But you are reading it, aren't you? Exactly.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#156 NightCabbage

NightCabbage

    Member

  • Members
  • 97 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 05:39 PM

So it definitely looks like it'll be a wind-up drum.

Also, did anyone else notice that the Raider fires the dart when the "pump" handle reaches the front of the gun?
Maybe there's just a second trigger there, and that's the "slam mode".

Also, as long as the talk in the thread isn't offensive, or doesn't turn into a spam-fest or a flame-war, I don't really see a problem with letting people talk about a new gun. That's my definition of what a forum is for - letting people talk about a common subject.
  • 0

#157 Drew is nerfing

Drew is nerfing

    Member

  • Members
  • 77 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 06:27 PM

seems to be crap to me. I can only asume it will have a reverse plunger, which we know from the recon sucks. The drum mag is interesting...but it seems a bit, overkill? Besides, it would only be compatible with the recon and longshot, and if you singled either you can't use it anyway. ALthough I can see how an angel breeched LS with one of those clips might be deadly in a war. The fact that it has the same head means it will accept standard clips too. Also, I can't imagine a way to make this thing shoot stefans. Looks like you guys are gonna need to use stock or half stefans with this puppy.
  • 0

#158 CaptainSlug

CaptainSlug

    Resident Mad Scientist

  • Administrators
  • 4,763 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 07:08 PM

Some of the speculation on how things might work, when they turned out not to be the case, inspired modders to try those things for themselves anyway.

Not "examples" I know.

Still, New ideas --> good.

This thread does not contain any new ideas.
You are arguing that speculation, conjecture, and theory threads have somehow added to this hobby in a tangible way. I cannot disagree more.

If such threads are left to grow, in my experience the opposite is true. People end up spending time arguing/posturing in threads about what will or will not work instead of running practical experiments. Ideas/theories are WORTHLESS if they're not tested. This is why design threads are discouraged.

This kind of thread however is even more pointless, because you're arguing about how something that already exists functions. What is the point in doing so? Bragging rights that your theory was correct?
You will only be able to find out for sure when the product hits the shelves. And then you may discover that you may have wasted a load of time since the images you spent so much time over-interpreting were in fact those of a demonstrational prototype that didn't reach mass-production in exactly the same form.

Edited by CaptainSlug, 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM.

  • 0
The little critters of nature, they don't know that they're ugly. That's very funny, a fly marrying a bumble bee. I told you I'd shoot, but you didn't believe me. Why didn't you believe me?

#159 foxdemon82

foxdemon82

    Member

  • Members
  • 114 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM

Posted Image



Posted Image



Do you think this could be modded in any way to shoot stefans....I think its possible (sort of)

Edited by foxdemon82, 17 February 2009 - 07:19 PM.

  • 0
QUOTE(Glint @ Feb 15 2009, 07:07 PM) View Post

So stop with all the "new Recon" crap. This thing definately isn't a Recon, I'll wager my soul. Someone can quote me on that if they'd like

#160 Oni Kadaki

Oni Kadaki

    Member

  • Members
  • 193 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 08:05 PM

Some of the speculation on how things might work, when they turned out not to be the case, inspired modders to try those things for themselves anyway.

Not "examples" I know.

Still, New ideas --> good.

This thread does not contain any new ideas.
You are arguing that speculation, conjecture, and theory threads have somehow added to this hobby in a tangible way. I cannot disagree more.

If such threads are left to grow, in my experience the opposite is true. People end up spending time arguing/posturing in threads about what will or will not work instead of running practical experiments. Ideas/theories are WORTHLESS if they're not tested. This is why design threads are discouraged.

This kind of thread however is even more pointless, because you're arguing about how something that already exists functions. What is the point in doing so? Bragging rights that your theory was correct?
You will only be able to find out for sure when the product hits the shelves. And then you may discover that you may have wasted a load of time since the images you spent so much time over-interpreting were in fact those of a demonstrational prototype that didn't reach mass-production in exactly the same form.


The "point" that you ask for is that some of us, namely, those of us who continue to post in this thread, enjoy speculating on the blaster's function, utility and modability based on the few bits of actual info that we have. I understand that such a discussion has no value in your eyes, slug, as well as, in all probability, those of the moderators/administrators. That said, I think that until the thread becomes harmful in some way it should remain open, simply to help stop new threads from popping up, if for no other reason. That way, we who actually enjoy such threads get our SINGLE cesspool of baseless speculation, as opposed to multiple such threads popping up (hopefully). As for the people who don't like such threads, aside from the administrators and moderators, who have to monitor the thread for violations, there is no reason you have to read the thread.
  • 0

#161 SchizophrenicMC

SchizophrenicMC

    Member

  • Members
  • 390 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 09:54 PM

In response to all the "it fires when the handle is forward", I had an epiphany today.

It's only coincidence that it does that.

When you prime the plunger, normally, it hits a catch. Well, if you hold down the trigger, the catch is non-existant. From there, it's like a ratchet: It goes over the pump handle the one way, and when you pull back, it's caught for the full stroke.

Just speculation, but it would seem to be a new idea...


And, to VACC, I wasn't here during the Vulcan craze, so don't kill me, please?
  • 0
QUOTE(NerfUK @ May 8 2009, 11:54 AM) View Post

(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)

QUOTE(analogkid @ May 20 2009, 10:04 PM) View Post

Every size rod you could ever want.

#162 Salmon

Salmon

    Member

  • Members
  • 447 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:30 PM

In response to all the "it fires when the handle is forward", I had an epiphany today.

It's only coincidence that it does that.

When you prime the plunger, normally, it hits a catch. Well, if you hold down the trigger, the catch is non-existant. From there, it's like a ratchet: It goes over the pump handle the one way, and when you pull back, it's caught for the full stroke.

Just speculation, but it would seem to be a new idea...


And, to VACC, I wasn't here during the Vulcan craze, so don't kill me, please?

But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.
  • 0
Welcome to I-dont-care-isburg, population: me.
We're located in I-Don't-Give-a-Damn County, in scenic Shut-the-Hell-Up-achussets.
Maybe you're familiar with our annual charity drive where we ask for shit, and no one gives any.

#163 sputnik

sputnik

    Member

  • Members
  • 911 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:31 PM

But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.



The Nerf Bow N Arrow.
  • 0
tcambre on IRC.

<3

#164 Robonerfer1

Robonerfer1

    Member

  • Members
  • 66 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:50 PM


N-force swords


Look at the gun in the right of the big picture with the Nerf 40th anniversary logo, it could be the Stormfire.
Also, the raider still looks awesome.
  • 0
XBL GT: XPwNaGexDuDex12 add me
QUOTE(OfAllTheNerf @ Mar 29 2008, 04:11 PM) View Post

Yeah, it also helps if your nuts are made of steel. Or atleast as hard as steel, to ensure that you can shoot far enough.


#165 Salmon

Salmon

    Member

  • Members
  • 447 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:51 PM

But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.



The Nerf Bow N Arrow.

Touché.

So, a pull-and-release kind of thing.
I can see that.
Couldn't be very accurate though...

Edited by Salmon, 17 February 2009 - 11:51 PM.

  • 0
Welcome to I-dont-care-isburg, population: me.
We're located in I-Don't-Give-a-Damn County, in scenic Shut-the-Hell-Up-achussets.
Maybe you're familiar with our annual charity drive where we ask for shit, and no one gives any.

#166 sputnik

sputnik

    Member

  • Members
  • 911 posts

Posted 17 February 2009 - 11:55 PM

But then, if I'm understanding you, it'd be as bad as a push-pull gun, except with a spring. You mean that its just pulling back the plunger and releasing it? I somehow don't think that would work.



The Nerf Bow N Arrow.

Touché.

So, a pull-and-release kind of thing.
I can see that.
Couldn't be very accurate though...


Only in slam fire mode.
Otherwise, it would catch until you pulled the trigger.
  • 0
tcambre on IRC.

<3

#167 Split

Split

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,771 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 12:55 PM

You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.
  • 0
Teehee.

#168 Hell Gunner

Hell Gunner

    Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 03:37 PM

I would have had the whole barrel thing aiming down instead of up myself, but other than that it looks awesome! I'd love to plug that ammo barrel into my Recon CS-6!
  • 0

#169 sputnik

sputnik

    Member

  • Members
  • 911 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 03:37 PM

You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.


It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...


Who knows.
  • 0
tcambre on IRC.

<3

#170 SchizophrenicMC

SchizophrenicMC

    Member

  • Members
  • 390 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 07:24 PM

Well, it's just speculation. Personally, I'm not set on anything until I get my hands on its internals.
  • 0
QUOTE(NerfUK @ May 8 2009, 11:54 AM) View Post

(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)

QUOTE(analogkid @ May 20 2009, 10:04 PM) View Post

Every size rod you could ever want.

#171 Firefox551

Firefox551

    Member

  • Members
  • 167 posts

Posted 18 February 2009 - 09:59 PM

That is freaking briliant.
  • 0
"Whats algebra? I like pudding." - My friend Luke

"We have to remember what we all have in common, and why we are here. Our shared love of shooting things, and each other with little foam darts." - Niaja Blue

#172 Heartw0rk

Heartw0rk

    Member

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 10:56 AM

Distance doesn't matter to me. I'm going to buy this simply for the clip and use it with my modded Longshot for HvZ. I've been in a lot of firefights/showdowns in the game with a bunch of 6-round clips and managed, but going-- at minimum-- 29 shots before reload? This is exactly what I needed.
  • 0

#173 diamondbacknf1626

diamondbacknf1626

    Member

  • Members
  • 835 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:04 AM

You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.


It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...


Who knows.


Nobody knows, and nobody will know until they actually see the internals of the gun. But I think I have an idea. I believe it was briefly mentioned earlier in the thread, but not in detail. There could be some form of "trigger" towards the front of the gun. Therefore, there would be two triggers that have to be depressed in order to fire the weapon. This fits, because in regular single fire mode, the handle would have to be all the way forward in order to pull the trigger. This could be because pushing it forward activiates that other trigger. Once it's forward, you can pull the main trigger to fire. However, in slam fire, since the first trigger is held down, you only have one to deal with, and when you slide the handle forward, it fires the gun. This could mean two catches, or some form of two stage catch. But like many others have said in the thread, nobody will no exactly until they actually have the gun in their hands, no matter how much speculation there is.
  • 0
QUOTE(TxNerfer @ Nov 13 2010, 12:42 PM) View Post

Hey...I got a crazy idea: how about you stop all that sigging stuff? It's not even my thread and it annoys me.

#174 SchizophrenicMC

SchizophrenicMC

    Member

  • Members
  • 390 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:56 AM

You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.


It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...


Who knows.


Nobody knows, and nobody will know until they actually see the internals of the gun. But I think I have an idea. I believe it was briefly mentioned earlier in the thread, but not in detail. There could be some form of "trigger" towards the front of the gun. Therefore, there would be two triggers that have to be depressed in order to fire the weapon. This fits, because in regular single fire mode, the handle would have to be all the way forward in order to pull the trigger. This could be because pushing it forward activiates that other trigger. Once it's forward, you can pull the main trigger to fire. However, in slam fire, since the first trigger is held down, you only have one to deal with, and when you slide the handle forward, it fires the gun. This could mean two catches, or some form of two stage catch. But like many others have said in the thread, nobody will no exactly until they actually have the gun in their hands, no matter how much speculation there is.

I doubt there are two triggers. The forward handle doesn't look like it has one.
  • 0
QUOTE(NerfUK @ May 8 2009, 11:54 AM) View Post

(I forgot to take a picture of my own poppers)

QUOTE(analogkid @ May 20 2009, 10:04 PM) View Post

Every size rod you could ever want.

#175 diamondbacknf1626

diamondbacknf1626

    Member

  • Members
  • 835 posts

Posted 19 February 2009 - 12:06 PM

You can see that he's not letting the handle go in the video. He seriously slides the handle forward, and when it's finally there, the dart fires. Which is how I drew up that conclusion.


It could be kinda like a reverse Arrowstorm...


Who knows.


Nobody knows, and nobody will know until they actually see the internals of the gun. But I think I have an idea. I believe it was briefly mentioned earlier in the thread, but not in detail. There could be some form of "trigger" towards the front of the gun. Therefore, there would be two triggers that have to be depressed in order to fire the weapon. This fits, because in regular single fire mode, the handle would have to be all the way forward in order to pull the trigger. This could be because pushing it forward activiates that other trigger. Once it's forward, you can pull the main trigger to fire. However, in slam fire, since the first trigger is held down, you only have one to deal with, and when you slide the handle forward, it fires the gun. This could mean two catches, or some form of two stage catch. But like many others have said in the thread, nobody will no exactly until they actually have the gun in their hands, no matter how much speculation there is.

I doubt there are two triggers. The forward handle doesn't look like it has one.


Not a visable trigger, I might've been unclear. I meant some form of plate serving as a trigger within the actual shell of the gun, so that pushing the handle forward, and therefore pusing it against the plate, actuates it. Therefore, having the handle in the forward position activates one stage of the catch, while pulling the actual trigger activates the final stage of the catch, therefore firing the gun. In slam mode, the trigger's already pulled, therefore all that's necessary is to activate the catch by pushing the handle forward (giving the "slam fire" effect). Or I could be completely wrong, and it could be something entirely different. Only time will tell.
  • 0
QUOTE(TxNerfer @ Nov 13 2010, 12:42 PM) View Post

Hey...I got a crazy idea: how about you stop all that sigging stuff? It's not even my thread and it annoys me.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users