#1
Posted 18 January 2008 - 04:52 PM
Blaffair to Rememblack.
#2
Posted 18 January 2008 - 05:00 PM
#5
Posted 18 January 2008 - 05:46 PM
Blaffair to Rememblack.
#6
Posted 18 January 2008 - 06:10 PM
It's gonna be bitchin.
<3
#7
Posted 18 January 2008 - 08:25 PM
I don't really undestand why General Cole is making articles of clothing with my name on it. First it frightened me, but after a few hours I got over it. It seems obvious that General Cole is hoping to have sex with me.
#8
Posted 18 January 2008 - 10:56 PM
I looks great, and I like J.J. Abrams, but I'm afraid it'll be another 'Snakes on a Plane' deal. I hope it's actually worth it to watch. Nothing ruins a cinematic experience like too much hype and too little movie.
I couldn't agree more. I personally hope it's more like Snakes on a train. "Oh noes I had a curse put on me" "Oh noes we're on a train" "OMGS SNAKES EXPLODED OUT OF ME!". I wish I was kidding...
But yeah, looks like an awesome movie. How was it P.C. III?
#10
Posted 18 January 2008 - 11:34 PM
Know the monster that attacks the city?
Not only will you not know pre-movie, but post-movie also. I'm an ass. Worst movie EVER.
So you never get a clear view of the monster?
Well, there goes the point of seeing a 'Monster Movie'...
I don't really undestand why General Cole is making articles of clothing with my name on it. First it frightened me, but after a few hours I got over it. It seems obvious that General Cole is hoping to have sex with me.
#11
Posted 19 January 2008 - 01:03 AM
The whole movie was hand cammed which really added to the audience feeling as if they were there, and the reason you never really see the monster until the near ending is because JJ wanted us to feel as confused and disoriented as the people that were going through this event.
Thomas: You wouldn't know a good movie if it hit you in the groin. JJ is a great writer, the movie had a great story and plot. And I cant seriously know how you didn't see the monster in the movie, you must be blind.
Overall if you know good movies then you will like it, if you watch shit like Effeminate Movie and Meet the Spartans you will think its a big flop. Oh, and you need to see it in theaters or it will ruin the great sound effects that Lucasfilm made for the movie.
Edited by Axelion_burnout, 19 January 2008 - 01:09 AM.
#12
Posted 19 January 2008 - 01:05 AM
Know the monster that attacks the city?
Not only will you not know pre-movie, but post-movie also. I'm an ass. Worst movie EVER.
So you never get a clear view of the monster?
Well, there goes the point of seeing a 'Monster Movie'...
damn.
Well, to quote another recent movie,
"OWW OWW OWWFUCKEDDY OWW."
EDIT:
It was still a good movie.
Edited by sputnik, 19 January 2008 - 01:06 AM.
<3
#13 Guest_yourface_*
Posted 19 January 2008 - 04:51 PM
#14
Posted 19 January 2008 - 11:29 PM
Edited by AODL, 19 January 2008 - 11:29 PM.
I don't really undestand why General Cole is making articles of clothing with my name on it. First it frightened me, but after a few hours I got over it. It seems obvious that General Cole is hoping to have sex with me.
#15
Posted 20 January 2008 - 12:22 AM
<3
#16 Guest_CornMan_*
Posted 20 January 2008 - 01:04 AM
I don't think so.you will think its a big flop. Oh, and you need to see it in theaters or it will ruin the great sound effects that Lucasfilm made for the movie.
Edited by CornMan, 20 January 2008 - 01:05 AM.
#17
Posted 20 January 2008 - 02:46 AM
All monster movies are the same. Monster wrecks city, monster is destroyed or runs home. You can't tell me that there is a difference in this movie.
This is not a comment against the director or writer, just the movie content and theme.
Edited by Chanclas, 20 January 2008 - 02:47 AM.
-Groove
Tits > Video Games
#19
Posted 21 January 2008 - 06:11 PM
IMDb cloverfield 8.1 out of 10
Edited by Axelion_burnout, 21 January 2008 - 06:17 PM.
#20
Posted 21 January 2008 - 06:44 PM
This contest may have some flaws, as people can simply be a deuschbag over the internet. By Lying.
A war-like setting/invitational would be better...
#21
Posted 21 January 2008 - 06:47 PM
<3
#22
Posted 21 January 2008 - 07:56 PM
I have to agree. The ending was .... lame.
How else could it have ended? Think about it, this was the only good way to end it. Also, from a publicity stand point, this ending certainly has people talking about it.
I personally really liked the movie. It was a monster movie, to expect any plot other than the generic one is a little presumptuous but with this movie you get more than just a monster movie. It actually has a subplot. For the amount of money they spent on it, it was REALLY AMAZING. Think about it, the film has already earned about twice as much as it cost to produce it! And in January too! For anyone who wasn't aware January is generally the dumping ground for Hollywood's failures.
Got Nerd?
#23
Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:12 PM
Although the first person camera view made me feel sick at times, it makes more an interesting movie-- I really liked the clips from Coney Island mixed in too- it made for an interesting way to change the pace of the movie (was it just me, or did something fall into the ocean when they were recording on the Carousel?)
Personally, I thought the lice-like small forms of the monster were the scariest. Their bites cause you to essentially explode? Crazy!
I nerf like a four year old.
#24
Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:46 PM
Personally, I thought the lice-like small forms of the monster were the scariest. Their bites cause you to essentially explode? Crazy!
I guess....
<3
#25
Posted 21 January 2008 - 09:48 PM
Is the "monster" cool looking? I don't wanna waste 15 bucks.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users