
#1
Posted 04 May 2007 - 09:45 PM
#2
Posted 05 May 2007 - 01:00 PM
#3
Posted 05 May 2007 - 01:11 PM
#4
Posted 05 May 2007 - 02:43 PM
Edited by chefdave, 05 May 2007 - 02:44 PM.
#5
Posted 05 May 2007 - 02:54 PM
chefdave, on May 5 2007, 03:43 PM, said:
What color SM3K are you looking at? If I remember right Yellow is best Blue is 2nd (but doesnt hold a candle to Yellow) and green is..ugh.This was not intended as a which gun is better thread. I have had my eye on these guns and was wondering if they were worth buyying.
#6
Posted 05 May 2007 - 03:52 PM
I both are pretty comprable in range when modified, giving a slight advantage to the AT2k, only by experience, despite the fact that the SM3000's air "tank" is a bit larger. My SM3000 blue got ranges of 60-70 feet from 5 inch SCH40 PVC barrels (mega stefans for ammo) in the 8-shot turret, and that's why I integrated a side mounted SM 1500 single barrel, which could reach out past 100 feet with consistency.
But if you don't know what you're doing, you can basically ruin the advance on the turret of the SM3000. There are so many doohickeys that if you don't look carefully and remember where everything goes, you basically will end up single barreling it, which kills the whole purpose of modding a 3000.
Hell, I'd buy both of them. You can't find SuperMaxx blasters much anymore, and they're still my favorite genre of blasters (even more than the AirTech series, or today's line ups.)
Hey look, I found an old picture of my 3000 (rest in pieces);

-Piney-
<!--quoteo(post=209846:date=Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM:name=boom)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(boom @ Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM)

It's to bad you live in hawaii I bet there are not many wars there.Wait what am I saying<b> you live in hawaii you lucky bastard.</b>
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
#7
Posted 05 May 2007 - 09:40 PM
#9
Posted 06 May 2007 - 08:48 PM
Thom, on May 5 2007, 01:11 PM, said:
I'm just going to take a moment to giggle at this statement.Range is a concrete, empirical issue
Ranges are very subjective and the reported ranges of people that haven't accurately documented their method and conditions of measurement can be off by as much as 20 feet. The standard deviation in reported ranges is extremely wide, so take every reported range with a huge grain of salt.
#10
Posted 11 May 2007 - 10:49 PM
CaptainSlug, on May 6 2007, 06:48 PM, said:
I'm just going to take a moment to giggle at this statement.
Ranges are very subjective and the reported ranges of people that haven't accurately documented their method and conditions of measurement can be off by as much as 20 feet. The standard deviation in reported ranges is extremely wide, so take every reported range with a huge grain of salt.
Unless, of course, the range test comes from people that actually know what they're doing (such as yourself, CS)...

By the way Piney, that is one awesome looking SM3k Blue. I am going to get some soon (I hope).
Edited by frost vectron, 11 May 2007 - 10:59 PM.
"I am a leaf on the wind--watch how I soar" - Hoban "Wash" Washburne, Serenity.
#11
Posted 12 May 2007 - 12:34 AM
CaptainSlug, on May 6 2007, 09:48 PM, said:
Yes, but the subjective issues are thus confined to disagreements about the procedure for range testing, and it still isn't a "which gun is better" thread.Thom, on May 5 2007, 01:11 PM, said:
I'm just going to take a moment to giggle at this statement.Range is a concrete, empirical issue
Ranges are very subjective and the reported ranges of people that haven't accurately documented their method and conditions of measurement can be off by as much as 20 feet. The standard deviation in reported ranges is extremely wide, so take every reported range with a huge grain of salt.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users