#1
Posted 10 December 2005 - 12:16 PM
#2
Posted 10 December 2005 - 12:20 PM
IF you somehow got a small bladder of air in the back of a missle/arrow, how would you put it onto the gun to fire it? And how would you have it release? I don't think that this is realistic at all.
TS
#4
Posted 10 December 2005 - 01:07 PM
#5
Posted 10 December 2005 - 01:24 PM
#6
Posted 10 December 2005 - 01:34 PM
Funny you mention rockets...
That is one of my son's Christmas presents. I don't intend for him to shoot it at anyone, but in addition to the spud howitzer I'm building now, I'd figure to round out his ballistic education with a good toy rocket that doesn't burn anything (engines=money). I had Estes model rockets when I was a teen and caused some damage in the neighborhood. Hopefully this is a safer alternative (though not as high as the old school rockets).
EDIT; corrected picture.
-Piney-
Edited by Pineapple, 10 December 2005 - 01:39 PM.
<!--quoteo(post=209846:date=Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM:name=boom)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(boom @ Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->
It's to bad you live in hawaii I bet there are not many wars there.Wait what am I saying<b> you live in hawaii you lucky bastard.</b>
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
#7
Posted 10 December 2005 - 02:14 PM
#8
Posted 10 December 2005 - 02:43 PM
#9
Posted 10 December 2005 - 05:41 PM
#10
Posted 10 December 2005 - 10:22 PM
Sg, I don't think that would be practicle in a nerf war.
Mjdfuzzy: meh most people areound here are like "suk my balls michigan" and i'm like "you don't have balls you loser"
[12:43] mjdfuzzy: your mom's an ugly slut
[12:43] mjdfuzzy: ...and i love it
#11
Posted 11 December 2005 - 12:23 AM
What happened when I was younger, was that I used to experiment with friends with engines, and ejection delay (the last number on the engines; C6-3, for example=3 second delay).
For example, if a rocket took C6-3s, we'd use C6-7s, to see if we could get the 'chute to open on the way down, 30-40 feet off the ground. Well, we found out that exhaust gas is HOT, and sets dry grass aflame. The neighbors weren't too happy.
Hopefully, this will be a safe, fun alternative. I had thought that the principle of the rocket was similar to the air-water rockets I shot as a kid, which indeed DID have pressurized air and water to propel the rocket skyward.
It probably is like a Titan that shoots skyward.
Sorry to go off-topic temporarily. I'd like to see someone make a self-propelled Nerf projectile...though it's a long shot.
-Piney-
<!--quoteo(post=209846:date=Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM:name=boom)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(boom @ Feb 5 2009, 06:27 PM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->
It's to bad you live in hawaii I bet there are not many wars there.Wait what am I saying<b> you live in hawaii you lucky bastard.</b>
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
#12
Posted 11 December 2005 - 10:23 AM
No, it is alot more powerful than a titan, It seeems to have alot more presure.It probably is like a Titan that shoots skyward.
-Piney-
Sg, if you was going to do this idea, inspite of inpracticality, these rockets would be what to do it with, as the sides are plastic. They plastic sides would be perfect for an expanding bladder.
Mjdfuzzy: meh most people areound here are like "suk my balls michigan" and i'm like "you don't have balls you loser"
[12:43] mjdfuzzy: your mom's an ugly slut
[12:43] mjdfuzzy: ...and i love it
#13
Posted 11 December 2005 - 11:49 AM
#14
Posted 11 December 2005 - 06:24 PM
#15
Posted 11 December 2005 - 07:01 PM
You aren't going to get any range with air pressure (self-propelled). You need an estes type engine without as much power.
#16
Posted 11 December 2005 - 07:54 PM
Then you could just tie the other end of the string to the launcher, and maybe when you shot the missile, the string would unravel.
But... it seems to me, that at this point, if you want a rocket to go farther than it does... you should just build an air cannon and make a special projectile that has a ton of foam padding. The projectiles from here:
Finned Darts
Flares
Those might give some inspiration. But NEVER shoot those at someone... but maybe some ideas can be gleaned.
If I were making a foam missile, I'd probably just use 1/2 CPVC as a stem, wrap FBR around it, then buy some foam from a craft store (or head to the UPS store for packing foam) and shape it into a "head" (this would need to be as wide as the fins). Then, make the fins out of some plastic material (like the binder on the web site above), wrap the leading edges of the fins in bubble wrap or something, then fire that baby out of a 2" PVC barrel.
Boom. Missile.
But... isn't that not nerf? Is it necessary to shoot a huge projectile at someone from 200 yards away?
Copy!
#17
Posted 11 December 2005 - 08:53 PM
HAHAHA
#18
Posted 11 December 2005 - 08:56 PM
EDIT: MY computer frooze and when i restarted it. it showed up as a double post
Edited by Sharpshooter, 11 December 2005 - 08:57 PM.
HAHAHA
#19
Posted 13 December 2005 - 09:14 PM
Are we still even talking about nerf?
Half of these ideas use combustion and/or they explode at the end.
Are we still even talking about nerf?
This is like saying "I want to add a helium-filled water balloon to a stefan, so it'll counteract the force of gravity just enough so that it'd float forever, thus having incredible ranges. It'll work...right?"
Are we still even talking about nerf?
Just for the record, it won't work. The balloon would act as a giant drag net, and all velocity would be gone. It'd take minutes for the stefan to get to your target (if it didn't stop altogether, which it would.)
I think this is extremely impractical for anything regarding nerf. For something like this to work, it'd take a crapload of extra junk attached to the projectile. That makes it into a semi-lethal object that we're now contemplating "How can I shoot this at someone in a friendly competition of children's guns?"
Seriously...by all means be creative, but don't try to shoot this stuff at somebody. And if you're thinking about this in terms of a war, remind me to never Nerf with you, for fear of my head.
#20
Posted 13 December 2005 - 10:22 PM
#21
Posted 13 December 2005 - 10:23 PM
"I want to add a helium-filled water balloon to a stefan, so it'll counteract the force of gravity just enough so that it'd float forever, thus having incredible ranges. It'll work...right?"
That can be done, but not in the way you described. It would be a waste of time but it would get incredible ranges.
#22
Posted 14 December 2005 - 02:41 AM
#23
Posted 14 December 2005 - 04:55 PM
But seriously guys, I agree with Falcon. This is nerf, and though this experimentation is nice, it shouldn't be thought of as nerf. More of a science experiment. Nerf modding for practical reasons doesn't include Arrows/missles at all, because they aren't as cost effective or as good performance wise either. Just stick with darts. I don't even care which.
TS
#24
Posted 14 December 2005 - 09:29 PM
It has nothing to do with density. It has to do with the mass and the shape of the object (air resistance).I'd figure that making any dart have no weight (and thus float) would also make it worthless
Edited by m15399, 14 December 2005 - 09:30 PM.
#25
Posted 14 December 2005 - 10:44 PM
It has nothing to do with density. It has to do with the mass and the shape of the object (air resistance).
An object with more density will have more mass with less size causing less air resistance. It has been shown that Stephans made heavier will fly farther, usually they are made heavier by putting more weights into the stephan. The weights have greater density than the foam, otherwise they wouldn't make it heavier.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users