#76
Posted 10 November 2004 - 10:43 PM
~ompa
#77
Posted 10 November 2004 - 11:27 PM
Snipemaster of NHQ
#78
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:53 AM
#79
Posted 11 November 2004 - 02:38 PM
Look more like an actual revolver anyway! Interesting gun-nerd story as well, the first revolver ever produced that moved the chamber forward to the barrel to create a better seal with the barrel was the Russian Nagant Revolver '95. Smith and Wesson copy, and it was the .44 magnum of the day, granted it was a .45, but that was enormous for a pistol calibur then.I already have plans for barreling it. Since the original barrels get wider to accomodate the rubber suction cup, you could have an extra barrel (brass and PETG would probably work best) that comes into the original barrel and has a seal with the original barrel's wider part. you would have to pull the barrel in and out between shots but it would probably shoot alot farther than stock.
Anyway. I doubt you could apply the technique used in the above revolver to the Maverick, for one, a seal with the chamber and the air tank would be dificult. But that is DEFINATELY on the right track.
Murphy MacManus: There were nine of them, you retard! What were you going to do with the last three, laugh them to death? Funny man?
-brothers Macmanus, Boondock Saints
#80
Posted 11 November 2004 - 03:16 PM
The Maverick does not load from the back.
It does attach to the Titan, but does not trigger from the Titan like the Scout.
The Unity Power System is not currently sold in the EU because toy regulations are different in the US and Europe. The N-Strike currently sold in the US cannot be sold in Europe.
And thanks for all the good words. The team is enjoying reading them.
#81
Posted 11 November 2004 - 03:24 PM
The N-Strike currently sold in the US cannot be sold in Europe.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
#82
Posted 11 November 2004 - 03:48 PM
Thanks again for the pic...this gun looks godly
#83
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:09 PM
Formely known as Fire_brian burke on NHQ
#84 Guest_nerferdude_*
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:44 PM
#85
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:51 PM
Edited by NinjZ, 11 November 2004 - 04:52 PM.
#86
Posted 11 November 2004 - 04:56 PM
-I mean, if they made the Titan, which we got to shoot 200ft, doesnt seem like there is much of a need for restraint on their part, as they have tons of ways of scaling down range for the main consumer base of their guns, such as over release valves and bad-darts and air restrictors, can all make it easy enough to sell a medium/low powered gun for kids with the capability of being a highly functional our-kinda-nerfin weap.
Edited by ShortShit, 11 November 2004 - 04:58 PM.
#87
Posted 11 November 2004 - 05:20 PM
~El Whore
#88
Posted 11 November 2004 - 05:29 PM
Because the post offices in our country want about 20 Euro if the package comes from America.chessler, why don't you just order one off ebay or something?
My Nite Finder was expensive enough:
8 Euro____Nite FInder
12 Euro___Shipping Costs
20 Euro___Post Office
______________________
40 Euro !!!!!!
#89
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:01 PM
Edited by cooldood31, 11 November 2004 - 07:01 PM.
#90
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:06 PM
Thats pretty steep. If thats the case (32 EU for shipping) then spend the money on something you'll be happy as hell with (and don't buy many, and be verra careful when your a' moddin').Because the post offices in our country want about 20 Euro if the package comes from America.chessler, why don't you just order one off ebay or something?
My Nite Finder was expensive enough:
8 Euro____Nite FInder
12 Euro___Shipping Costs
20 Euro___Post Office
______________________
40 Euro !!!!!!
Oh, and they fire micros.
Edited by texmustache, 11 November 2004 - 07:06 PM.
#91
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:14 PM
Will there ever be another breechloaded clip rifle again like the Sawtooth? I mean it has side cocking handle and everything.
#92
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:33 PM
I'm wondering: What standards bog down your team's mechanical design process (excluding materials and testing, unless you want to be really nice)? I'm guessing ISO 8124-1 sets the maximum power output and momentum of any exposed moving part, but I'm not sure what else is factored in. If it's too much a bother, much like merely conforming to the standards, that's cool, but any listing/description of the most influential standards would be appreciated.
Again, excellent job, here and in the past, and many thanks for taking time out of your busy life to get the legal authorization to communicate here. Hope this little guy sees excellent sales figures (and minimum complaint)!
- Death
#93
Posted 11 November 2004 - 09:37 PM
#94
Posted 12 November 2004 - 08:27 AM
KED=(0.5 m v^2)/A
where m is the mass of the projectile, v is the initial velocity and A is the impact area of the projectile. We have to assure that all of our blasters meet a certain value or less for KED.
We can shoot the Titan missle so much further than regular darts because the impact area (ie the dart tip) is so much greater.
#95
Posted 12 November 2004 - 08:32 AM
~Halfling
#96
Posted 12 November 2004 - 09:11 AM
It is great that there is a representative for Nerf in our community. Cx, I think he/she deserves a title, and maybe the first person here with the Maverick as their avatar.
#97
Posted 12 November 2004 - 05:50 PM
#98
Posted 12 November 2004 - 06:00 PM
Hmm...although since i heard Hasbro lost the patent for arrows, is there any plans for new ammunition? Perhaps a 1"/1.5" OD projectile, like a super-dart with a massive suction tip? And is the Nerf Team focused on target shooting projects? (The N-Strike was cool with the TV thing, the Tech Targets had a nice gimmick...) I think a Night Strike line would be cool, with lit-up Targets and "Laser" sights (like the nightfinder and eagle eye) would be very cool. Because, don't the gimmicks sell the toys?One of our primary regulations deals with the kinetic energy density of a projectile that is fired using stored energy (like that of a spring or air). The kinetic energy density is equal to:
KED=(0.5 m v^2)/A
where m is the mass of the projectile, v is the initial velocity and A is the impact area of the projectile. We have to assure that all of our blasters meet a certain value or less for KED.
We can shoot the Titan missle so much further than regular darts because the impact area (ie the dart tip) is so much greater.
#99
Posted 13 November 2004 - 07:10 PM
Or better yet, rereleasing the Supertech 9000 along with the night strike line. That would be fuggin shweet.Hmm...although since i heard Hasbro lost the patent for arrows, is there any plans for new ammunition? Perhaps a 1"/1.5" OD projectile, like a super-dart with a massive suction tip? And is the Nerf Team focused on target shooting projects? (The N-Strike was cool with the TV thing, the Tech Targets had a nice gimmick...) I think a Night Strike line would be cool, with lit-up Targets and "Laser" sights (like the nightfinder and eagle eye) would be very cool. Because, don't the gimmicks sell the toys?One of our primary regulations deals with the kinetic energy density of a projectile that is fired using stored energy (like that of a spring or air). The kinetic energy density is equal to:
KED=(0.5 m v^2)/A
where m is the mass of the projectile, v is the initial velocity and A is the impact area of the projectile. We have to assure that all of our blasters meet a certain value or less for KED.
We can shoot the Titan missle so much further than regular darts because the impact area (ie the dart tip) is so much greater.
#100
Posted 14 November 2004 - 09:42 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users