#1
Posted 14 December 2003 - 08:17 AM
Though it could be a decoy...
Thoughts?
but we do sh*t and F---"
~Webbster, Foam Improvement.
"I got four points... I sackled you"
#2
Posted 14 December 2003 - 08:38 AM
<a href="http://www.albinobla.../flash/posting" target="_blank">Posting and You</a>
#3
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:46 AM
#4
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:53 AM
#5
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:56 AM
#6
Posted 14 December 2003 - 10:03 AM
I can't imagine how the troops feel now, the morale must be thicker than Jello around the border.
#7
Posted 14 December 2003 - 11:26 AM
Edited by merlinski, 14 December 2003 - 11:27 AM.
#8
Posted 14 December 2003 - 11:33 AM
Now all we need is Osama in a box.
I think Saddam's caputre must be handled very carfully as could become a point for greater conflict in the Arab world or a way to consilidate the Iraqi government.
Don't forget to eat your meat based vegetable substitute children.
#9
Posted 14 December 2003 - 12:33 PM
#10
Posted 14 December 2003 - 12:46 PM
Oh shut up you fucking commie.I just hope that people don't associate the military's success with Bush being a good president. Oh, and by the way, GunnedDown, Saddam never killed anyone you knew.
#11
Posted 14 December 2003 - 12:51 PM
http://cam-m.cjb.net
#12
Posted 14 December 2003 - 01:10 PM
You better believe Bush will use this as political capital on the campain trail it would be naive not to. He isn't going to just let this go away, he'll use it to further justify US actions in Iraq and to assert that his policy is and was the correct corse of action. This makes him seem a strong commander and chief of the US military. Some people (conservatives)will see that as a reason to re-elect him, some (liberals) won't.
Me I'm a moderate. I don't always support GWB's domestic policy (Tax cuts to the wealthy) andI don't always agree with how Bush has handled Iraq among the international community. However I do support and acknowledge the need for our troops over there, this capture makes that support worth while. I think Bush is trying to be a good president, whether or not he has been is debatable.
Don't forget to eat your meat based vegetable substitute children.
#13
Posted 14 December 2003 - 01:55 PM
#14
Posted 14 December 2003 - 02:02 PM
#15
Posted 14 December 2003 - 02:54 PM
#16
Posted 14 December 2003 - 03:02 PM
how fitting.
Post number 420...heh heh.
Edited by GrOOvE, 14 December 2003 - 03:02 PM.
"Too close for missiles, I'm switchin' to guns"
#17
Posted 14 December 2003 - 03:11 PM
You know, NHQ's unique post count system did not include that, but 69 was taken advantage of. Hmm.Post number 420...heh heh.
Yeah, that was good news to wake up to. If you wake up to news, anyways. Beats something like "Get yer ass outta bed and ready to go!" or the usual stuff.
#18
Posted 14 December 2003 - 04:57 PM
Yea, this needs to get pointed out...I don't always support GWB's domestic policy (Tax cuts to the wealthy)
Just so everyone knows the U.S. of A. has what we call a graduated tax bracket. The more money you make, the more you pay in your income taxes. So... To clear this up. Those wealthy people who the government takes such good care of pay the most taxes. The top 5% of America's wealthy pay 1/3 (one third) of the United States' income taxes. "Tax cuts for the wealthy" is pure and simple bullshit, they pay the most of all of us, so they deserve the most back. It's that simple.
Oh, and Merl, not to be a fuckhead but I have to say something or my head's just gonna explode.
About associating "the military's success with Bush being a good president":
Yea, I mean there's no direct connection. Our military rocks. But if Bush hadn't signed what had to get signed and say what had to get said, Saddam would still be living in the lap of luxury, murdering who he wanted on a whim. We found the motherfucker in a hole, where he should have been since day one. I'm glad to see our boys getting the job done either way.
And about Saddam never killing anyone GD knew:
Who cares? Because he didn't kill GD's mother he can't rejoice because a mad man is in custody? A tyrant has handcuffs on that say "Made in America". Hell yea.
And on a completely different note: Congratulations to the US military. Talk about getting the job done.
Edited by Evil, 14 December 2003 - 05:04 PM.
#19
Posted 14 December 2003 - 06:28 PM
Im with you!I think we need to hang him by his balls and let the Kurds have a pinata party.
Aim toward your goals...Quicken your stride...
With great power comes great responsibility.
#20
Posted 14 December 2003 - 08:37 PM
Oh go take over Poland you fucking fascist.Oh shut up you fucking commie.
I know Bush is going to use it, I just hope that it doesn't work. Oh, and about the GunnedDown comment, I thought he was referring to the belief that Saddam had something to do with 9/11. If he was referring to relatives of friends that lived in Iraq, I'm sorry for misinterpreting it.
Evil, I know that this wouldn't have happened were it not for Bush's decision to invade Iraq, but I don't think that this will solve any of the problems that the invasion created.
#21
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:14 PM
So... To clear this up. Those wealthy people who the government takes such good care of pay the most taxes. The top 5% of America's wealthy pay 1/3 (one third) of the United States' income taxes. "Tax cuts for the wealthy" is pure and simple bullshit, they pay the most of all of us, so they deserve the most back. It's that simple.
I agree with Evil.
Nerf on!
#22
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:31 PM
George W. Bush still has a few thousand weapons of mass destruction under his control, and he doesn't seem to be afraid to use military power to strike at foreign countries. He's a real threat, because nobody, including the United Nations, can stop him.This rein of "weapons of mass destruction" holding is finally over.
- Death
#23
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:40 PM
http://cam-m.cjb.net
#24
Posted 14 December 2003 - 09:57 PM
Well, with a few exceptions. Whoever wanted to try to oppose Bush would have to employ the use of a few unconventional weapons. For instance, Gamecube equipped with Super Monkey Ball 2, a Magic Eye book, or perhaps a bag of yummy pretzels?George W. Bush ... He's a real threat, because nobody, including the United Nations, can stop him.
#25
Posted 14 December 2003 - 10:05 PM
If Iran or North Korea were to use "the bomb" or something similar, it would be viewed as a proof of might and a testament to victory for them. For us, there would be the lingering question of "how could we do that?"
To say Bush is a world threat is a joke. He has yet to apply pressure to anyone innocent regime or establishment.
But hell, if anyone wants to convince me that Hussein or the Taliban were really a great bunch of guys, hit me up with an e-mail at least. Thanks.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users