#1
Posted 20 February 2008 - 07:51 PM
Last YANO, i shared an idea with Bags about this....
Well one day was bored and watching paintball fights and whatknot. It got boring kuz they were all 3rd person shots but dont display it close up and also actually seeing a hit. A Paintball requires a high speed camera to come out clean on frame. So i felt that a dart has a better chance to come on frame.
Unfortunately Darts actualy come out clean on film but when you render your footage for posting on the net, some darts dont show up at all unless its point blank.
(Note: Bag's Fking Pecan Video)
So...considering no one's ever REALLY officialy done this except WWII fighter planes.
Im actually gonna try a gun cam.
This means taking my high quality Kodak Dual Lens cam and strapping it on a gun and see if it works....better that filming darts on motion from a panning perspective.
So anybody ever try this?
Im gonna run some tests with a nightfinder than work my way up the ladder.
I got one clip of Hubbard firing a shot...
A dart shot from a nightfinder has about five frames or more before its off camera.
so we'll see.....
what do you think
#2
Posted 20 February 2008 - 07:56 PM
Don't want to shove balls in tight spaces. Trust me, bad idea.
For sale: Vintage WWII French rifles. Dropped once, never fired.
#3
Posted 20 February 2008 - 08:30 PM
This contest may have some flaws, as people can simply be a deuschbag over the internet. By Lying.
A war-like setting/invitational would be better...
#4
Posted 20 February 2008 - 08:51 PM
Edited by venom213, 20 February 2008 - 08:53 PM.
#5
Posted 22 February 2008 - 12:20 PM
Some of my other tests indicate that Foam Darts on consumer camera footage actually show up for only four frames but my shutter speed is consumer speed so...on my school cams it should show up better.
Ill let you guys know when i post the test...thx
Edited by PILZ, 22 February 2008 - 12:22 PM.
#6
Posted 22 February 2008 - 02:40 PM
Hey Guys,
Last YANO, i shared an idea with Bags about this....
Well one day was bored and watching paintball fights and whatknot. It got boring kuz they were all 3rd person shots but dont display it close up and also actually seeing a hit. A Paintball requires a high speed camera to come out clean on frame. So i felt that a dart has a better chance to come on frame.
Unfortunately Darts actualy come out clean on film but when you render your footage for posting on the net, some darts dont show up at all unless its point blank.
(Note: Bag's Fking Pecan Video)
So...considering no one's ever REALLY officialy done this except WWII fighter planes.
Im actually gonna try a gun cam.
This means taking my high quality Kodak Dual Lens cam and strapping it on a gun and see if it works....better that filming darts on motion from a panning perspective.
So anybody ever try this?
Im gonna run some tests with a nightfinder than work my way up the ladder.
I got one clip of Hubbard firing a shot...
A dart shot from a nightfinder has about five frames or more before its off camera.
so we'll see.....
what do you think
I did it mounted behind my LS' rail. looked alright.
#7
Posted 22 February 2008 - 03:38 PM
Edit:
Although it might not be worth it becuase those cameras add a considerable ammoutn of weight to a barrel, so it would only destroy your barrel and render the gun useless.
Edited by Zaxbys, 22 February 2008 - 03:45 PM.
"Bitces be crazy"
QUOTE
"Hey girl... you like water sports?"
~Groove 6/26/09
#8
Posted 23 February 2008 - 12:13 AM
http://www.firehelmetcam.net/
http://www.helmetcamera.com/
http://www.amazon.co...m/dp/B000AYAJ34
Here are some options. The firefirghter version comes with multiple mounting accesories which could easily be mounted to a blaster.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users