rork, on Nov 10 2008, 11:44 PM, said:
I shiver to think what you could do with this monstrosity, which pushes almost twice as much air.
Keep in mind that air volume is only part of the equation. Plunger mass plays a part as well, and while the air volume is huge, the plunger head is also quite massive, reducing possible gains. My initial comparative tests only showed a gain in range of about 10'-20' (going from ~80' to ~95') when using the same spring, going from 1.25" to 2".*
*Of course, another issue with this much plunger volume is that the necessary barrel length starts to get goofy long (assuming the 1:4 ratio). My usual barrel choice is brass, so I was never able to test above a 12"...which is the length that I use on a standard SNAP. Better ranges may be possible, but barrel material makes it more difficult to achieve.
Anyway, it's like you were saying, rork...I think the main advantage in using 2" PVC is in using some manner of inline/RSCB system, because of air volume. Slow air seems to be okay in a system like that.
Hello. I am Indigo of the Rainbow Clan. You Nerfed my father. Prepare to die.