Vaccum Propulsion
#1
Posted 22 October 2007 - 08:49 PM
I know it's not so clear so I will clarify. There are two chambers. Both have plungers in them. The plungers are attatched at the back. The only difference between these are the fact that the front of one of them is sealed up. So, you pull back on both of them and they catch on a clothespin catch, or something like that. There is now a vaccum in the lower chamber, so when you release the catch both the plungers will fly forward. One of these plungers goes to a barrel, and launches a dart.
The one main problem I see with this is that it is hard to maintain a vaccum, you need a perfect seal. But otherwise I am eager to start this project, I just wanted to see what you guys think first.
-Dr. Suess
#2
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:00 PM
#3
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:00 PM
The way I saw it was that I could have double the size of a normal plunger tube for a risk in reliablility. It's a great novelty, and if you can make and use one, more power to you. However, it doesn't present a very practical approach to hurling foam as of now.
Founder of the Shadow Militia.
Founder of Nightshade Laboratories and The Nightshade Armament Corporation.
#4
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:30 PM
#5
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:47 PM
This guy can see the future!
hasbro in a nerf war!!!!! dude the will cancel it and confinscate are guns
#6
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:49 PM
Edited by nerfturtle, 22 October 2007 - 09:49 PM.
-Dr. Suess
#7
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:54 PM
Ratcheting Catch System I:
I) Blue: Plunger tube and barrel assembly
II-III) Brown: Plunger and Vacuum Rod respectively
IV) Green: Vacuum Tube
V) Light Blue: Catch notches
VI) Red and Gray: Catch and trigger bar respectively
Step I: The upper of the two colored diagrams. The plunger and vacuum tube are pulled back, and the ratcheting catch has moved up into the notches to hold the assembly in the cocked position.
Step II: The lower of the two colored diagrams. The catch has been pulled down as the trigger is pulled back. As the catch pivots with the backwards motion of the trigger bar, the sear (upper part of the catch that engages the notches) is pulled free and the plunger and vacuum rods rush forward.
Founder of the Shadow Militia.
Founder of Nightshade Laboratories and The Nightshade Armament Corporation.
#8
Posted 22 October 2007 - 09:57 PM
#9
Posted 22 October 2007 - 10:36 PM
Wow, I've always wanted to use a 3D printer, they look so cool. Does your school have one? What do you mean by fire control? If you mean a catch then I see no reason that a clothespin trigger would not work. I was also thinking about the issue of having the vaccum decrease over time, and came up with a solution. You could have whatever was sealing the vaccum chamber be a chack valve, so if air leaked in, you could just push it out via the check valve.
We have a 3-D ABS printer, it uses the stereolithograph file from a CAD design the part.
I'm using 3 syringes, one as the plunger and 2 to propel the plunger syringe. I just need to do some calculations on volume when I get them, but the two syringes combined will have a larger volume than the third one.
#10
Posted 23 October 2007 - 09:49 AM
#11
Posted 23 October 2007 - 11:13 AM
#12
Posted 23 October 2007 - 11:54 AM
A vacuum is hard to maintain and requires a very tight seal. Tight seals create a lot of friction unless you use the right materials. And even then if you keep a vacuum you would only have 15psi of actuation to work with. Frankly it's NOT going to outperform a spring.
i got thinking, and this is the death knell of the project. If I permanently seal the end of the syringes, what happens when I break the seal, and that end is still closed? I now have lost my vacuum, and it wont work anymore.
#13
Posted 23 October 2007 - 04:23 PM
P.S.: Sorry if I made some grammar mistakes... I'm not feeling quite well today...
I'm amazing at Forza3! I destroyed the engine of a 2mil C car by downshifting! YAY!
I hate you. And all noobs who are like "OMFG i r liek, glued sh1t 2 shit. jak offf ma ego. NAOW!"
#14
Posted 23 October 2007 - 04:49 PM
Yes.... But you could make a spacer at the bottom and de-cocked the pressure in the vacuume could be at a -20 or so already... that might work.... But other than that it is completely unfeasible. Just use a spring.
P.S.: Sorry if I made some grammar mistakes... I'm not feeling quite well today...
I meant if the syringe plunger ever got pulled out of the tube, then no vacuum at all, unless you fabricate some type of bleed system when you reinsert them.
#15
Posted 23 October 2007 - 09:06 PM
-Dr. Suess
#17
Posted 25 October 2007 - 02:46 PM
Some of the newer Webley and Beeman airguns use gas springs, but they call it a "gas ram" because it sounds cooler. I'm gonna try to make a snap out of one; it should get here tomorrow.
A gas spring would be the opposite of using a vacuum as a spring, I suppose...
Edited by privateer, 25 October 2007 - 03:07 PM.
All your base are belong to us!!"
{Presbyterian College Nerf}
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users