Jump to content


Photo

Disk Shot Versus Old Nite Finder

comparing and swapping parts

2 replies to this topic

#1 ambushbug

ambushbug

    Member

  • Members
  • 103 posts
  • Location:Ottawa ON

Posted 24 September 2007 - 10:08 PM

First of all, I've read on several occasions that the old (dark blue and orange) Nite Finder has a better spring than the newer ones, though the difference isn't supposed to be obvious just from looking at it visually (mentioned here)

I've also read a few comments by members saying that the Disk Shot is "basically the old (dark blue and orange) Nite Finder" yet, in Renegade's mod, he shows pics of the spring for the Disk Shot compared with the 'new' NF and they look nothing alike. Given that the old and new NF supposedly look similar, then (via the transitive property) obviously the Disk Shot and old NF springs should look pretty different too.

I can only conclude that the comments regarding Disk Shot = old NF are referring to performance (despite apparently different springs) but just judging from the tension felt when cocking and firing both blasters, I got the impression that the old NF still packs more punch. As such, I decided to transplant the apparently more powerful guts of the old NF into the shell of the Disk Shot, which I like more than the old NF.

Regardless, for the sake of others who might be curious, I decided to post some pics comparing the assembly of my old (modded) NF and a recently acquired (stock) DS. As it turns out, the whole cocking handle (plus spring) can be swapped, with only a few differences (outlined below). The successful transplant of the old NF cocking handle and spring into the Disk Shot (and vice versa) corroborates Renegade's earlier assertion that the plunger assembly is nearly identical.


Here are pics of:

them side by side

Posted Image


the plunger tubes are practically the same length and ID (judging from the success of the transplant); old NF above, DS below.

Posted Image



the springs (old NF above, DS below). Like Renegade said, the cocking handle is a little longer in the DS

Posted Image


Note that the catch/trigger mechanisms are slightly different leading to some minor incompatibilities; my upgraded Disk Shot (with NF cocking handle) takes a bit of a longer trigger pull to discharge (if you like a hair-trigger, this is less than ideal) - notice the gap between catch and trigger:

Posted Image

Conversely, the old NF (with DS guts) is a bit easier to pull

Posted Image

Just for starters, I did a basic barrel mod (17/32" brass) but will be looking into some integration ideas in the future. Oh yeah, I also added a second O-ring to the plunger head (of the Disk Shot only).

Posted Image


Some other basic differences I noticed: the quality of screws has really slipped in the newer blaster (Disk Shot). The screws are smaller and strip alot easier than the ones for the old NF. Even the plastic tabs that anchor the plunger tube to the shell of the stock DS seem pretty weak - the rear one was already cracking when I opened it up. These factors discouraged me from making a more robust/objective comparison between the two springs; the ideal way to do this would be to compare the ranges of the DS (modded or otherwise) with the stock cocking handle/spring versus with the NF assembly--but I was worried that the tabs would snap off (or I'd strip the screws) after repeated fooling. Also, if you noticed in the pics of the trigger/catch mechanism, the Disk Shot's trigger is much flimsier looking than the old NF's.


Anyhoo, there it is - now if anyone had all three (old NF, new NF and the DS), it would be great to see the differences and, ideally, see some actual quantification of these differences that people often claim.

___EDIT: interpretation for those still unclear (e.g. Sixfivetwo) -> clearly, the springs of the old NF and the DS don't look alike. Whether they perform the same remains to be tested - but I'm betting that the old NF still beats the DS. Unfortunately, I don't have a new NF so I can't comment on performance here, but Renegade's write-up (in the mod directory and referenced in earlier in the text) suggests that the DS is better than the new NF. So in my mind:
oldNF > DS > newNF

BUT it would be best if someone who has ALL THREE actually tested this by measuring ranges using each spring placed in the same stock blaster (or at least with the same barrel mod)

Edited by ambushbug, 26 September 2007 - 06:00 PM.

  • 0

#2 nerfnerd88

nerfnerd88

    Member

  • Members
  • 182 posts
  • State:Minnesota
  • Country:United States

Posted 26 September 2007 - 05:06 PM

Wow. . .

I honestly dont know why it doesnt shoot as far as the NF.

Crazy good Evaluation
  • 0

#3 six-five-two

six-five-two

    Member

  • Members
  • 752 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, B.C.

Posted 26 September 2007 - 05:43 PM

Disk Shot spring looks exactly like the Commlink II spring.

I read most of that, but can you just tell me the verdict if the Disk Shot spring is like the old NF spring or is the Disk Shot spring like the new Nitefinder springs?
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users