Jump to content


Photo

Concept Gatling Gun

rf20+tommy20= gatling?

11 replies to this topic

#1 ashs75

ashs75

    Member

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 07 August 2007 - 09:52 PM

First off im sorry if this thread is in the wrong spot or if the "concept" angers anyone.

Now down to bussiness.
While sitting thinking about the tommy 20's motor thing I think I had a stroke of genius. First maybe we could remove the tommy20s trigger system and the yellow clip thing which would leave the motor and the black thing that spun the clip thing. Then perhaps attach the motor to the black spinner so the when turned on it spins the black thing.

After that put in the rf20 internals into the tommy 20 and expand the airtank by alot.

After that attach pieces of plastic or pvc to the black spinner that when the motor is turned on spins the whole thing and then attach a pvc chain filled with nerf darts to the spinner.

Pump the rf20 and turn on the motor and fire

Is this idea plaussible (sp?)

Edit: spelling and capitilizations

Edited by ashs75, 07 August 2007 - 09:53 PM.

  • 0
Rifle vs Tank = terrorist getting owned

#2 Guest_DarkInfection_*

Guest_DarkInfection_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 August 2007 - 10:03 PM

No.
  • 0

#3 Flaming Hilt

Flaming Hilt

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,070 posts

Posted 07 August 2007 - 10:05 PM

...why, again, wouldn't you just use an RF20?
...same thing, less work, different body.

All the same:

Is this idea plaussible

If you really want to know, try it and find out for yourself.

EDIT: Either way, that's not how a gatling gun works. They usually have between 4-8 barrels that have a constant supply of shells from a hopper (grav-feed works best because you can keep dumping shells in). I won't get too technical but basically a round goes into one of the barrels, gets fired, and dumped out the bottom all in a 270 degree rotation. The other 90 degrees is dead space where said barrel is empty.

Could be wrong. Either way. Not a Gatling. Just use an RF20.

Edited by Flaming Hilt, 07 August 2007 - 10:08 PM.

  • 0
" Beneath this mask there is more than flesh, Mr. Creedy. Beneath this mask there is an idea...
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
V

#4 telekinetic

telekinetic

    Member

  • Members
  • 154 posts

Posted 07 August 2007 - 10:25 PM

Now that Recruit has pointed out I'm an idiot, I think you'd be best off just trying to convert the RF20, rather than getting a Tommy involved.

Edited by telekinetic, 08 August 2007 - 02:47 AM.

  • 0
Frylock is telekinetic, right?

#5 Recruit

Recruit

    Member

  • Members
  • 67 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 02:36 AM

This could work but it would be easier to just use an rf 20 and make that chain fed.

To telekinetic read the following.

After that attach pieces of plastic or pvc to the black spinner that when the motor is turned on spins the whole thing and then attach a pvc chain filled with nerf darts to the spinner.



Ash by the way try to use better grammar. Good grammar lets us be able to understand your line of thought better and said misunderstanding by telekinetic wont happed very much.

fixed a typo

Edited by Recruit, 08 August 2007 - 04:08 AM.

  • 0
Falcon about himself.
QUOTE
... Ask Bags...he'll tell you without hesitation that I'm an idiot, but I certainly think about it before I do something stupid.


"Good character is something you cannot fake. And it always comes full circle at the end."

-Piney-

#6 telekinetic

telekinetic

    Member

  • Members
  • 154 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 02:45 AM

This could work but it would be easier to just use an rf 29 and make that chain fed.

To telekinetic read the following.


After that attach pieces of plastic or pvc to the black spinner that when the motor is turned on spins the whole thing and then attach a pvc chain filled with nerf darts to the spinner.



Ash by the way try to use better grammar. Good grammar lets us be able to understand your line of thought better and said misunderstanding by telekinetic wont happed very much.


Haha, I guess I'm too hopped up on cough medicine to read properly. I'll just wander off now.

What's an RF29? A Typo, or an automatic I haven't heard of that would be easier to convert?
  • 0
Frylock is telekinetic, right?

#7 Recruit

Recruit

    Member

  • Members
  • 67 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 04:11 AM

Ooops, I meant rf20 not rf 29. So it was a typo Sorry.

Note: I hope you arent really dopping your selfwith medicines to get high.
  • 0
Falcon about himself.
QUOTE
... Ask Bags...he'll tell you without hesitation that I'm an idiot, but I certainly think about it before I do something stupid.


"Good character is something you cannot fake. And it always comes full circle at the end."

-Piney-

#8 ashs75

ashs75

    Member

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 09:52 AM

Ok thanks for pointing out i was thinking to comlicated.

I'll also try to use better grammer in my future posts.

Edited by ashs75, 08 August 2007 - 09:53 AM.

  • 0
Rifle vs Tank = terrorist getting owned

#9 telekinetic

telekinetic

    Member

  • Members
  • 154 posts

Posted 08 August 2007 - 01:32 PM

Ooops, I meant rf20 not rf 29. So it was a typo Sorry.

Note: I hope you arent really dopping your selfwith medicines to get high.


Merely a side effect of their medicinal benefits...I'm home sick from work today. ^_^

I am also working on making an RF20 chain fed, I will post up my progress later today.
  • 0
Frylock is telekinetic, right?

#10 b00m13

b00m13

    Member

  • Members
  • 386 posts

Posted 09 August 2007 - 01:06 AM

Maybe you can ask this guy for advice... although I don't see how it would possibly load the ammo in fast enough...

http://www.break.com...ntball_gun.html

Edited by b00m13, 09 August 2007 - 01:07 AM.

  • 0
The only place Wal-Mart exists in New York, is in our TV's.

#11 Thom

Thom

    Member

  • Members
  • 759 posts

Posted 09 August 2007 - 07:09 AM

On a related note:

I know that concept threads are frowned on. I also know why: because the vast majority of them, such as this one, will never come to fruition, rendering them nigh-useless. But were I to build a homemade, I would certainly prefer to post the concept to see if anyone sees any flaws, has suggestions, or has tried the same thing before. Is there some sort of accepted middle ground between "neat concept, build it and come back" and a finished homemade?
  • 0

#12 Carbon

Carbon

    Contriberator

  • Moderators
  • 1,894 posts

Posted 09 August 2007 - 10:18 AM

Is there some sort of accepted middle ground between "neat concept, build it and come back" and a finished homemade?

Here’s my take…

I’ve always felt that the middle ground is, “here’s my concept, and here’s what I’ve built so far.”, even if it doesn’t shoot a dart. You can test the initial idea yourself to see if it’s even feasible, and then post the start of your work to get input.

If you have a design that you’re not even sure about starting, try PMing a few people with sketches and ideas, and discussing it that way.

It’s not so much that the Homemades forum is “anti-idea”, but more that its baseline is one of actual work and practical application.
  • 0
Hello. I am Indigo of the Rainbow Clan. You Nerfed my father. Prepare to die.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users