First Shot Vs. Maxshot
Posted 04 November 2006 - 09:19 PM
I know not what WWIII wil be fought with; however, WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones...
Posted 04 November 2006 - 09:24 PM
"I bluff it. I don't throw my weight around and say I know what I'm doing." ~ Mick Jagger
Posted 05 November 2006 - 12:19 AM
Posted 05 November 2006 - 03:05 AM
Posted 05 November 2006 - 08:54 AM
Hi, I am about to buy a first shot or a maxshot, and since I have never had either, I need to know which is better? I mean, Ranges, size, rof, difficulty to operate, and other characteristics. If there are any offers for trading or selling either one, please say.
Put it this way: I got shot with a heavily modified maxshot and I started to bleed. I also got shot with a heavily modded firstshot and didnt feel anything.
Maxshot has so much power. Almost as much as an At2k.(If not More)
Posted 05 November 2006 - 12:04 PM
Cost is another factor, but if there's no money issue to consider then I would suggest you go with the Max Shot. Greater range, greater accuracy, and better overall utility than the First Shot. Like LotR said, the First Shot is a glorified sidearm, and not a particularly effective one at that.
Of course it has greater range and better overall utility. IT'S A RIFLE, not a pistol (which the First Shot is). Bigger spring=better ranges. I don't know about the accuracy bit. You could have just a crooked a barrel on a Max Shot as you could on a First Shot.
I'm sorry for the rant, but I just don't see a fair comparision when saying rang is a factor that should influence your purchase on a rifle vs a pistol.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users