8 replies to this topic

[General Cole]

Delete well, ya should know why, it is the original Starbucks logo.

Edited by General Cole, 11 September 2006 - 09:28 AM.

[Black Blade]

I'm sorry but what's the point of this topic?

[FromAbove]

Carbon may be beating me to it, but c'mon dude! You know the COC says no pornographic images, so there is just no point to be posting images of some starbuck titties.

FA.

[General Cole]

I dunno, I just thought it was interesting, not pornographic, I'll delete it though. I was just wondering what other people thought about this.

[The Infinite Shindig]

I did not catch the picture. I was out of town. If someone other than the original poster can PM me a link to the image, I'll look into doing something about it.

[Carbon]

Carbon may be beating me to it, but c'mon dude! You know the COC says no pornographic images, so there is just no point to be posting images of some starbuck titties.

FA.

It wasn't pornographic by any stretch (unless you consider any rendered nudity "pornographic" - so, no posting Michaelangelo's David.)...it was just the original Starbucks logo. Just another example of a company mainstreaming their logo as they grew. *shrug*. You can read about it's history at the Starbucks Wiki page.

Sort of a thread in search of a purpose, though.

[The Infinite Shindig]

I agree with Carbon.

However, I am tempted to suspend General Cole just to see if he'll come out to a New Jersey war just to bitch me out. It would be the furthest traveled by a participant since Spoon came to the first Apoc.

[Lancaster]

Yeah...I think that the picture is interesting enough, it just seems that starting a thread to say, "Hey, look nerfers! The original Starbucks logo had boobies!" Is a little immature.

[General Cole]

I was just looking for input on if you guys found it offensive, find of like research for a paper, and it was got an A+! This thread was created for the sole purpose of deming if today's generation found it offensive. The last generation sure did.