#51
Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:34 PM
I struggle to see how my film canister design, the "Anzac Nade", could be propelled that fast to cause that much damage really. I also don't really see how it could be flung that fast without opening either, but I suppose you probably want it to open in mid air. Also, the worst you can do is be copped with the flat end of the film canister, which would be somewhat like being hit with a fat stefan, only plastic.
Also, the names Tait
Can't wait to see the video [when I get home]. Sounds good.
#52
Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:56 PM
First off, 80 psi against a film canister filled with sand, in my experience, has enough energy behind it to easily take out a squirrel. Its energy at 100ft. is more than a .22 long's. I think I will make a video especially for you so as to show you the shear power of a cannon with 3 gallons of air behind the projectile. It is incredible. I once used a PVC rocket to accidentally take down a tree branch. The branch was only an inch or two in diameter, mind you, but still...
Hey CS, in my opinion your first design is far superior. I dunno why, but it probably is my inability to conceive how that latest one works.
I'm also going to modify that first one to try and solve some of the problems you described. I'll post what I get as results probably after Wednesday, since that's when my new barrel comes in . I think I might have to make a breach for it...mmm...steel...the Yoda of building materials...
Well, the sun's setting over here, so I can't really do much else today. That vid will be taken hopefully tomorrow. If not, expect the thing CS is designing to have a vid on Thursday.
Again, remember that these cannon are capable of massive power. I mean, with the right valve, a 20oz soda bottle full of water can easily be sent through 3/4" plywood at a hundred feet.
Ha, I need to get sound of my cannon firing that casing I made at 80psi. It's so much louder than anything else I've fired due to the seal the plastic bag makes....
#53
Posted 09 April 2006 - 07:02 PM
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#54
Posted 09 April 2006 - 07:09 PM
Because you did the same to meTait, you forced me to sign in. Why?
But yeah, I just don't see the need for all that PSI, honestly.
The only dangerous end of a film canister is the ends. Pad them out and you're set.
#55
Posted 09 April 2006 - 07:59 PM
#56
Posted 09 April 2006 - 08:16 PM
So pump guns, yes.
Plunger guns... maybe. The idea behind a plunger is more to move the air around than to pressurize it.
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#57
Posted 09 April 2006 - 08:21 PM
#58
Posted 09 April 2006 - 10:48 PM
The first one may not work for the following reason.Hey CS, in my opinion your first design is far superior. I dunno why, but it probably is my inability to conceive how that latest one works.
The cannon will be pushing the dart from the rear, but the front part of the dart will be in contact with the inside of the barrel. The result is that the accelerating force and friction resistance might set the granade off as soon as it's fired. The cardboard tube, in order to not be moved to the open position by friction with the barrel, needs to open towards the front of the dart rather than towards the rear.
All of the darts function from the same principle. One part of the dart comes to rest before the other. Here's what happens after they run into something or the part the chute is attached to is decelerated.
The first one will need some weights added to the cardboard tube "door".
The second one might work best because the part that decelerates last has more weight. Both could be tested quite easily by simply throwing them.
When I'm not so busy I might make a few of these out of pipe insulation, FBR, and scrap plastic.
That's assuming it's flying straight with weight balanced towards the front. Before the chute opens, a cylindrical projectile that's not spinning or drag corrected is just going to tumble. If you fire any amount of hard material from a gun that you want to be "safe" you MUST encase the projectile in a hefty layer of foam AND provide an ample amount of surface area to divide the load over.The only dangerous end of a film canister is the ends. Pad them out and you're set.
They build up pressure behind the dart to overcome friction. If the plunger gun can't build up pressure behind the dart then the dart isn't going to go anywhere.Plunger guns... maybe. The idea behind a plunger is more to move the air around than to pressurize it.
Edited by CaptainSlug, 09 April 2006 - 11:03 PM.
#59
Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:10 PM
They build up pressure behind the dart to overcome friction. If the plunger gun can't build up pressure behind the dart then the dart isn't going to go anywhere.
Right. The air moving from behind the dart has to build up that pressure. I guess it has a little to do with both.
I don't get how the second one works. It looks to me like it's the same thing, just without the door so the stefans could fly out right away. Or is the back part the door?
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#60
Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:13 PM
Edited by CaptainSlug, 09 April 2006 - 11:29 PM.
#61
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:38 AM
If anyone wants a foldable frisbee to use as a barricade buster I will soon have enough for everyone that wants one (or two) and hasn't been able to find them.
#62
Posted 10 April 2006 - 02:08 PM
#63
Posted 10 April 2006 - 03:20 PM
There go my dreams of selling semi-official Barricade Buster's.GOOD NEWS
If anyone wants a foldable frisbee to use as a barricade buster I will soon have enough for everyone that wants one (or two) and hasn't been able to find them.
I'm still cooking up some grenade launcher stuff. I'll post any good finds.
#64
Posted 10 April 2006 - 03:28 PM
#65
Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:18 PM
Once I have them in my hands I'll post a thread in the Trading section.Captain Slug I'd love to have 2 foldable frissbees for the baricade busters. How much would they cost? Thanks.
This is the wrong forum section for that. Check the sticckied threads in the modification forum.This is kinda off topic, but since you guys are the leaders, or so I see, on making darts go everywhere does someone know how to make a Titan into a shotgun, or have a grenade and a modd that allows it to fire a grenade
Edited by CaptainSlug, 10 April 2006 - 04:29 PM.
#66
Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:25 PM
Edit Okay Here it is
nerf nade(my best one yet by far)
The little "pin " type thing hits the wall triggering the realese valve which releases the air and making the stefans come out back.
Edited by nerfer34, 10 April 2006 - 05:33 PM.
#67
Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:51 PM
The problem is getting the trigger system down. I don't think a pin would work too well, and it's dangerous as well. But using an At2k isn't a bad idea. Maybe have the pump glued inside of one side. Just take out the goo tube alltogether (yes, I have done this), and then hack off the barrel and rotate it to face out the rear of the projectile, which would be filled with darts.
The problem (I'm repeating myself... NO!!!) is the trigger system. I have no ideas.
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#68
Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:53 PM
In order to release the air from an AT2K tank, or any other nerf gun thank for that matter, the valve pin is puled out by the trigger, not pushed in. Unless you can somehow rig up a contraption to pull the pin out, it won't fire.
It also seems as if the stefans would just fly in one general direction, not all over the place like a grenade is supposed to.
And... How are you going to prime the AT2K tank? Will you have a detacheble (sp?) pump with a threaded attachment? Actually, that wont work umless you put another valve on it because, from my understanding, there is no check valve on the tank. That would be a major problem if it couldn't hold air.
Edit: Flaming already came up with and idea for priming, it would get kind of bulky in my opinion though.
Edited by Lukeinator, 10 April 2006 - 05:56 PM.
#69
Posted 10 April 2006 - 06:16 PM
As for actuation, well, nose cone with a lever. I still have 1/4" SS square stock. If anyone has pulled apart a keyboard they know how I can get that force distributed evenly across the whole shmear.
That 'nade would be really damn heavy. Any ideas (besides using helium in the cannon)?
My shotshell failed finally. It shoots straight for the ground since I added a new 'chute to it. Well, time to make some of CS's torpedoes...
#70
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:10 PM
A pressure grenade of some kind would be fine as a hand grenade if you can figure out a safe and reliable configuration. They're much harder to make than something powered by elastic force.
Edited by CaptainSlug, 10 April 2006 - 08:14 PM.
#71
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:24 PM
#72
Posted 10 April 2006 - 11:23 PM
You are still going to need some type of check valve to keep the air in the tank. Mabye a very tiny ball valve.Also Yes I think the pump would be detachable. You would just pump into the air tank and detach it and launch the grenade.
Edited by Lukeinator, 10 April 2006 - 11:24 PM.
#73
Posted 11 April 2006 - 10:26 AM
I can use the same tank design to make a rearward-firing mortar with only a few modifications.
Edited by CaptainSlug, 11 April 2006 - 10:27 AM.
#74
Posted 11 April 2006 - 03:16 PM
Lukeinator yes I would probably need a small valve but I believe the sell very tiny lightweight valves that wouldn't affect it much. Thanks for your comments.
#75
Posted 11 April 2006 - 03:42 PM
-DTR
That's it. I'm done. I'm sorry there are breasts on the Internet.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users