Fav. Gun Attribute
#26
Posted 09 June 2004 - 07:08 PM
I'm good at running people down at like 20 feet, and I need to have a backup shot, and besides, If you can't hit the broad side of a barn with a sawed off shotgun, RoF is all that will save you.
On Pudding
"Product will be hot after heating"
On a Sweedish Chainsaw
"Do not try to stop with hands or genitals"
(Was alot of this happening somewhere? MY GOD!!)
#27
Posted 09 June 2004 - 07:13 PM
1)Home depot had PVC with a much smoother inside than the stuff they had before. so i swapped that out.
2)cutt in half stock micros with light bbs inside for a bit extra weight.
3)reinforced plunger and case
4)tape on the rubber thing on the plunger to increase seal
5)bungee cord
#28
Posted 09 June 2004 - 09:06 PM
90'= Very acceptedMy x-bow mods:
1)Home depot had PVC with a much smoother inside than the stuff they had before. so i swapped that out.
2)cutt in half stock micros with light bbs inside for a bit extra weight.
3)reinforced plunger and case
4)tape on the rubber thing on the plunger to increase seal
5)bungee cord
100'= Very believable
110'= Believable
120'= Convincable
130'+= Buh buh buh bullshit. Oh, I mean priceless.
It's not happening bud. Not with a spring gun. Not with and X-Bow. Not with a 1/2 PVC barrel. The seal on your plunger may add 5 feet at the most.
I'm sorry, I won't buy it when my SM5k won't shoot that far; flat or accurately. I can't bring myself to believe it.
Not in the game anymore, but it was great while it lasted. Thanks for the great years of fun, NH!
--
Resident "Spawn of Talio"
#29
Posted 09 June 2004 - 09:24 PM
Your ranges are bullshit.
Edited by Ice Nine, 09 June 2004 - 09:25 PM.
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#30
Posted 09 June 2004 - 10:20 PM
1) You can get 150' if it's not flat, (duh) but unless you use a hammer/flint/gunpowder bullet, I'm afraid foam doesn't fly that far. The sm5k easily eats the xbow in range (being one of the best loser guns out there), and with an EXTENDED tank, you can achieve 150 feet flat. Even then, it's a toughy, and on the high end of the scale. However, because you're using (ompa and I call em "loser darts") part of a stock dart, so you have a little more air carry, you CAN gain an extra few feet. But not 30 feet.
2) It appears that more people would choose the at3k over the sm1500 on this poll, yet in seirus', most people picked the sm1500 . To me, the sm1500 is like a mini loser, with 4 barrels. Not bad, but I'd rather lose a few feet and gain 2 shots.
3) Range and accuracy do not necessarily go hand in hand, though your common sense may make it seem so. A gun could blast a shot very far, but it'd be just that: a blast. For example, my NF shoots a good 70-80 feet, but it's not very accurate, whereas if I only pump my supermaxx1500 enough to get around 70-80 feet, it's still very accurate. (It still may not make sense....think about it.)
AA
EDIT:
I don't think I've ever disagreed with THIRST on this forum.ROF and accuracy are the only important ones.
Edited by AirApache, 09 June 2004 - 11:00 PM.
#31
Posted 10 June 2004 - 12:32 AM
AA, by range and acc. going hand in hand i meant, the more range you have the more accuracey youll want too.
Edited by NinjZ, 10 June 2004 - 12:43 AM.
#32
Posted 10 June 2004 - 04:42 AM
There is nothing like a good sized gun that justs sits right.
I think the poll was a bit a off, because generally i look for the best mixture of these factors, put together in one schweet package.
I also think that sheer power, noise and looks [or intimidation in general] is an incredibly high factor in the stakes.
#33
Posted 10 June 2004 - 12:12 PM
If you can keep their barrels and in a at3k vs sm1.5 or at2k, I would vote for the at2k since I have not had much luck with the 3k. However, I am sure if I mod a 3k in a way for it to be more reliable I would vote for it. Thirst used Pex barrels in it and it was very unreliable.
Crankymonky
#34
Posted 10 June 2004 - 02:38 PM
Ninjz, so you're using MEGA darts? or the minis? The mega's fit nicely in the 1/2 pvc. sch40. What sch pvc are you using? I still don't believe the 150 feet though. There is just too much resistance when you're using foam. It's not perfectly smooth, so the little pockets catch air, thus reducing the flight speed and range. Also, unless you're tips are aerodynamically made, and you're a physics prof., (oh wait...REAL bullets are like that) that's going to be hard to make it go that far. It looks to me like you've upgraded several things, so I'm going to say that you probably have had an average of 100-110, several times over that amount, and you've had an OUTLIER of 150 feet. If you're still convinced, and you think we're being idiots, post a video and convince me.
My apologies if you're correct. Until then....
AA
Edited by AirApache, 10 June 2004 - 02:38 PM.
#35
Posted 10 June 2004 - 03:09 PM
I know personally, at such high velocities as to be required by a 150' flat range, that a stock micro will catch the air and fall to the ground. (more wind resistance than momentum) X-bows are overrated, big time.Im using stock micros out of the 1/2in pvc, not stefans.
I forgot to add I put a DT3 spring in it also.
And isn't a DT3 spring weaker than an x-bow spring?
On Pudding
"Product will be hot after heating"
On a Sweedish Chainsaw
"Do not try to stop with hands or genitals"
(Was alot of this happening somewhere? MY GOD!!)
#36
Posted 10 June 2004 - 05:08 PM
#37
Posted 10 June 2004 - 05:43 PM
Thirst used Pex barrels in it and it was very unreliable.
Not after I remodded it...
THIRST
#39
Posted 10 June 2004 - 09:18 PM
I can't wait for that mad hornet type gun in the fall. Finally a BF remake!
FLASH: www.thinkhappy.netfirms.com
BAND: www.skwalrock.com
#40
Posted 11 June 2004 - 12:26 AM
~ompa
#41
Posted 11 June 2004 - 12:43 AM
#42
Posted 11 June 2004 - 01:42 PM
#43
Posted 11 June 2004 - 02:10 PM
Formerly Sane, if you've found a blastfire DX500 that outshoots a powerclip DX1000 with regard to distance, I will be shocked and awed.
Dude, thats not very hard, BF's do that all the time. If they dont, it means your a craptacular modder.
Edited by crankymonky, 11 June 2004 - 02:10 PM.
#44
Posted 11 June 2004 - 02:36 PM
This one gets about double the flat distance of a PC. It's reasonably accurate to 50-60' and can reach 75-80' flat pretty easily.Formerly Sane, if you've found a blastfire DX500 that outshoots a powerclip DX1000 with regard to distance, I will be shocked and awed.
#45
Posted 11 June 2004 - 09:23 PM
Edited by Formerly Sane, 11 June 2004 - 09:27 PM.
FLASH: www.thinkhappy.netfirms.com
BAND: www.skwalrock.com
#46
Posted 11 June 2004 - 09:31 PM
~ompa
W00t 204 posts! Some relavent, some not. (Ok mostly non-relavent...)
#47
Posted 11 June 2004 - 09:38 PM
FLASH: www.thinkhappy.netfirms.com
BAND: www.skwalrock.com
#48
Posted 11 June 2004 - 10:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users