Jump to content


Ufo's In Mexico

Are We Not Alone ?

31 replies to this topic

#26 NinjZ

NinjZ

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,005 posts
  • Location:jersey

Posted 15 May 2004 - 12:08 AM

vintage, it wasnt that the aliens came to a planet that was 75% water that made it crap. what made it crap was the fact that there is water in the friggen air! that alone should have killed them....If you can get over that fact, the movie is a hackneed atemped at a peek-a-boo alien thriller.
  • 0

#27 Alexthebeast

Alexthebeast

    Member

  • Members
  • 728 posts

Posted 15 May 2004 - 01:50 AM

That doesnt entirely go to your side either. There plenty of things we breathe in that would melt our skin if it ouched us in liquid form.
  • 0
<Fooz> In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

#28 NinjZ

NinjZ

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,005 posts
  • Location:jersey

Posted 15 May 2004 - 02:13 AM

moisture in the air is in liquid form.....
  • 0

#29 Vintage

Vintage

    Member

  • Members
  • 462 posts
  • Location:Minnesota

Posted 15 May 2004 - 08:50 AM

Ok, I can see why you didn't like it. You were expecting an alien thriller where the aliens fit your idea of them. It is very plausible that the water in the air (an extremely small amount compared to an actual drop of condensed water) had little effect or at least an unnoticed effect.

As I said earlier, the aliens might have had absolutely no knowledge of the properties of water.

I don't see why the accuracy of portraying aliens in movies is so important. The purpose of the movie was symbolism. If you have ever seen any of M. Night Shyamalan's movies (Signs, Unbreakable, The Sixth Sense, and even his not-yet-released movie The Village) they are all built around a fantastically woven plot of symbols. That is what makes the director so amazing. You have to watch his films with a different perspective to understand them.

~Vintage
  • 0
You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone
~Al Capone

#30 NinjZ

NinjZ

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,005 posts
  • Location:jersey

Posted 15 May 2004 - 03:06 PM

6th sence, now thats a movie we can both agree on vintage ^_^
  • 0

#31 Spaztic 75

Spaztic 75

    Member

  • Members
  • 135 posts
  • Location:Interstate 60

Posted 15 May 2004 - 06:37 PM

Most stars don't have planets and there is usually a double star system, not a lot only have one. And the amount of circumstances requried to have a planet that will support life is phenominal. Of cource there is the whole parallel univerce theory.
  • 0
In the big picture I'm still next to nothing, he never talks to me.

#32 merlinski

merlinski

    Member

  • Members
  • 403 posts

Posted 15 May 2004 - 09:18 PM

Most stars don't have planets and there is usually a double star system, not a lot only have one. And the amount of circumstances requried to have a planet that will support life is phenominal. Of cource there is the whole parallel univerce theory.

1. Like someone said, trillions of stars exist. And the odds were enough for 1 planet to fit the bill (ours), so is it that much of a stretch to say that there could be at least one more?

2. Thats based on the preconception of all life being the same as ours. Who knows, there could be life that thrives in 500 Celsius degree environments and breathes hydrogen.
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users