#1
Posted 12 December 2010 - 02:58 AM
Here are some photos:
Folded:
Open 3Quarter:
Open Side:
For best results, attach it to an "Alpha Trooper" or a "Furyfire" As seen below.
Attached Rear:
Attached Side:
#2
Posted 12 December 2010 - 04:49 AM
I could see this being used in your more high-powered blasters, or for things with shotgunned ammo and missiles. I think I might actually do this for my Defend-the-Core optimized Master Blaster project over break.
#3
Posted 12 December 2010 - 10:47 AM
This is a much easier way to do it, but his had more options on his ladder.
WTF, are you in Tony Stark's basement!?'
#4
Posted 12 December 2010 - 12:29 PM
I hate to burst your bubble, but it's already been done. http://nerfhaven.com...hl=Ladder Sight
This is a much easier way to do it, but his had more options on his ladder.
I took a look at that one, and it's really nice, but this one is, as you mentioned, much simpler. I may do some testing, and write the approximate distances on the notches, just like the real thing. Google "Grenade Sight" and a couple of the images are pretty close to the way this looks. I used them as inspiration.
#5
Posted 12 December 2010 - 02:58 PM
Kruger and Dunning (1999)
#6
Posted 12 December 2010 - 04:58 PM
No, it would actually be worse. Thats putting a sight on a shotgun...This would be infinitely more useful on a mav-titan scatter gun or something else of the sort than any single-shot blaster.
#7
Posted 12 December 2010 - 05:15 PM
No, that's like putting a sight on a grenade launcher. If you're looking for dispersion and high trajectory arcs, the closest would be a scatter gun.No, it would actually be worse. Thats putting a sight on a shotgun...This would be infinitely more useful on a mav-titan scatter gun or something else of the sort than any single-shot blaster.
Or you can continue to live your small deluded world.
Kruger and Dunning (1999)
#8
Posted 12 December 2010 - 06:10 PM
I just don't get how a distance sight would be particularily helpful for a gun that disperses over distance. It wouldn't be completely useless, but it seems like a scatter gun is meant more so for close distances. Also, the sight no matter what gun it is on is not gonna be particularly helpful. The comparison I posted was a bad one, I'll admit it.No, that's like putting a sight on a grenade launcher. If you're looking for dispersion and high trajectory arcs, the closest would be a scatter gun.No, it would actually be worse. Thats putting a sight on a shotgun...This would be infinitely more useful on a mav-titan scatter gun or something else of the sort than any single-shot blaster.
Or you can continue to live your small deluded world.
#9
Posted 13 December 2010 - 07:21 PM
I just don't get how a distance sight would be particularily helpful for a gun that disperses over distance. It wouldn't be completely useless, but it seems like a scatter gun is meant more so for close distances. Also, the sight no matter what gun it is on is not gonna be particularly helpful. The comparison I posted was a bad one, I'll admit it.No, that's like putting a sight on a grenade launcher. If you're looking for dispersion and high trajectory arcs, the closest would be a scatter gun.No, it would actually be worse. Thats putting a sight on a shotgun...This would be infinitely more useful on a mav-titan scatter gun or something else of the sort than any single-shot blaster.
Or you can continue to live your small deluded world.
The idea is that a real grenade launcher serves the purpose of a wide-dispersion weapon, like a scattergun. The real lethal radius of a grenade is much larger than videogames would lead someone to believe. A scattergun like a mav-titan would be the closest nerf approximation of that. You'd have to jam a ton of darts in there though.
Edited by zaphodB, 13 December 2010 - 07:22 PM.
"Which road do I take?" she asked.
"Where do you want to go?" responded the Cheshire cat.
"I don't know," Alice answered.
"Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."
#10
Posted 13 December 2010 - 08:15 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users