Nothing anyone does on the internet constitutes actually nerfing. There are fucking rules on the internet.If rules for nerf are lame then can I make a thread about taking a poop on a printout of the CoC? Or will that turn Talio on too much?
#26
Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:29 PM
#27
Posted 06 September 2010 - 06:59 PM
This thread sucks
Im sorry you feel that way but I think its something a few nerfers will be asking later on as Nerf releases more stuff like this. No disrespect.
Slug has spoken.
<3
#28
Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:20 PM
If there were ever to be a game, there would be a ruleset for that game, as there is no specific league that determines rules for all foam-related conflicts.
#29
Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:33 PM
Not really sure the purpose of this thread either...
If there were ever to be a game, there would be a ruleset for that game, as there is no specific league that determines rules for all foam-related conflicts.
It was just asking if the new shields were going to be as accepted as the Manta is but now I'm not sure anymore.
#30
Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:27 AM
Talio.
#31
Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:46 AM
I would not go to a war that allowed shields other then the manta ray. That's because the manta ray is pretty rare and for the most part useless. It makes a seriously shitty shield and they're not the easiest things in the world to find. That being said, if you find one and are actually really good with it, it looks super impressive. Not to mention there's easy ways around it. Shields and melee are just plain faggoty and you probably like looking at dicks if you're into them. There's my opinion. This thread sucks.
Talio.
Thank you. Thats all I was looking for.
#32
Posted 07 September 2010 - 12:50 PM
The rest of us would like to appologize for attempting to communicate with you as if you were a human being.Thank you. Thats all I was looking for.
#33
Posted 07 September 2010 - 04:27 PM
I would not go to a war that allowed shields other then the manta ray. That's because the manta ray is pretty rare and for the most part useless. It makes a seriously shitty shield and they're not the easiest things in the world to find. That being said, if you find one and are actually really good with it, it looks super impressive. Not to mention there's easy ways around it. Shields and melee are just plain faggoty and you probably like looking at dicks if you're into them. There's my opinion. This thread sucks.
Talio.
That made my day. Thanks buddy.
I fully agree with Talio.
I don't feel the way I used to do.
I know its bad,
After what we had,
But I’m just not the angel you knew.
#34
Posted 07 September 2010 - 04:48 PM
Venom: Haven't we all?
#35
Posted 08 September 2010 - 02:00 PM
I agree that shields shouldn't be something that everyone has, and that is incredibly prevalent. But really, not allowing the new shield gun not to block shots is pretty hypocritical and elitist. Restricting shields to only the people who have the money or happen to land a manta ray is kinda pompous. What you are basically saying is "Oh you can't get a shield because its easy to get. Sorry bro, you're gonna go have to buy a manta ray if you want a shield, rather than use the gun you already have!"I would not go to a war that allowed shields other then the manta ray. That's because the manta ray is pretty rare and for the most part useless. It makes a seriously shitty shield and they're not the easiest things in the world to find. That being said, if you find one and are actually really good with it, it looks super impressive. Not to mention there's easy ways around it. Shields and melee are just plain faggoty and you probably like looking at dicks if you're into them. There's my opinion. This thread sucks.
Talio.
Though they should be restricted, and the rules for shields should be a bit more coherent. Like no gluing manta rays/stampede shields on a crossbow or other primary. And personally, if you don't allow the new shields (well shield, the sword and shield one shouldn't be allowed. Its not a fucking gun.) then mantas shouldn't be allowed to block either. We don't do fucking grandfather rules here.
#36
Posted 08 September 2010 - 02:01 PM
Edited by z80, 08 September 2010 - 02:05 PM.
#37
Posted 08 September 2010 - 02:18 PM
Edited by MavericK96, 08 September 2010 - 02:19 PM.
#38
Posted 08 September 2010 - 02:33 PM
I agree that shields shouldn't be something that everyone has, and that is incredibly prevalent. But really, not allowing the new shield gun not to block shots is pretty hypocritical and elitist. Restricting shields to only the people who have the money or happen to land a manta ray is kinda pompous. What you are basically saying is "Oh you can't get a shield because its easy to get. Sorry bro, you're gonna go have to buy a manta ray if you want a shield, rather than use the gun you already have!"I would not go to a war that allowed shields other then the manta ray. That's because the manta ray is pretty rare and for the most part useless. It makes a seriously shitty shield and they're not the easiest things in the world to find. That being said, if you find one and are actually really good with it, it looks super impressive. Not to mention there's easy ways around it. Shields and melee are just plain faggoty and you probably like looking at dicks if you're into them. There's my opinion. This thread sucks.
Talio.
Though they should be restricted, and the rules for shields should be a bit more coherent. Like no gluing manta rays/stampede shields on a crossbow or other primary. And personally, if you don't allow the new shields (well shield, the sword and shield one shouldn't be allowed. Its not a fucking gun.) then mantas shouldn't be allowed to block either. We don't do fucking grandfather rules here.
it has nothing to do with the fact that the manta ray is old and elitest, it's the fact that they suck so I don't give a shit. If you can actually use one effectively then that's awesome and you should get a god damn metal. But I'm not playing with a bunch of 16 year olds carrying swords and shields. I'm just not. That's fucking gay. I mean playing nerf guns is gay already, but once you put that into the mix it becomes booty shorts and belly shirt on roller skates gay. And I like to keep my homosexuality manly.
Talio.
#39
Posted 08 September 2010 - 03:50 PM
What are these "rules that should be more coherent" anyways? Where is the "NIC Handbook" people keep referring to, because I never got one.
Edited by Galaxy613, 08 September 2010 - 03:51 PM.
#40
Posted 08 September 2010 - 06:11 PM
I have had it work for me. We are engaged now.Its like trying to get into a girls pants after you told her about your toy gun fetish.
#41
Posted 08 September 2010 - 09:58 PM
What are these "rules that should be more coherent" anyways? Where is the "NIC Handbook" people keep referring to, because I never got one.
I think that sums it up pretty well. And you never know. If you have a war with shields, and it works out really well, you might change the perceptions of a lot of people here. Like everything else, the rules for a war are organic. Even Einstein has been proven wrong over time.
Speaking of which, I'm goign to go work on some rules ideas of my own and try to test them out with some of my friends.
#42
Posted 09 September 2010 - 10:31 AM
#43
Posted 09 September 2010 - 03:37 PM
FLY #YOLOBOW FLY!
Wars Attended: NENO-CT 1-13 APOC -NJ13' 14' 15' 16' Frozen Foam-NY 15' Plains- PA. 15'
#44
Posted 09 September 2010 - 03:42 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users