Edited by Spartan_117, 05 June 2009 - 09:06 PM.
Another Question About My Mac.
#1
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:17 PM
#2
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:29 PM
A 2.0 GHz processor is weak... My BASIC HP laptop has a 2.5GHz dual core, so essentially 5 GHz or total power.
Save yourself the time. Don't buy a Mac.
I know I didn't answer your question, but it was a pre-emptive strike.
And most likely yes, it is the same computer with a wimpy processor for 100 dollars more.
Venom: Haven't we all?
#3
Posted 27 May 2009 - 07:41 PM
Well, I guess I was mistaken, weird.
Btw, 2.0 GHz isn't wimpy, its just average.
#4
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:13 PM
Second: spartan, you were probably looking at the entry level iMac, which is $1,199 with a 2.6Ghz processor.
#5
Posted 27 May 2009 - 08:35 PM
Wait... what? That made no sense. ATI sucks so why is that good that they shipped with it?First: Busta, shut your pie hole.
Second: spartan, you were probably looking at the entry level iMac, which is $1,199 with a 2.6Ghz processor.
And about the CPU speed:
Its wimpy for us HARDCORE steroid addicted gaming fiends. You know... those guys who sit there and brag about their rigs and spew off numbers to crap you don't care about? Those guys who will sit around Best Buy, making snide comments when you look at the Mac display? Those guys who think the only use for computers is gaming? To us, 2.0 and even 2.6 GHz is pretty sad, but then again, thats only because we feel a need to push computers to the limits to play games.
I will admit, having used both Macs and PCs, I would really like to see a merging of the two. The music and photo editing of a Mac, the ability to upgrade, game and do actual codding of a PC...
Wow... I am Captain Rants-a-lot
Most consumer Laptops ship with a dual core now a-days. Is that what it is? Or a single core?
Edited by BustaNinja, 27 May 2009 - 08:43 PM.
Venom: Haven't we all?
#6
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:03 PM
Codding? Like, with fish?do actual codding of a PC...
Edited by Carbon, 27 May 2009 - 09:03 PM.
#7
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:21 PM
Oh ok... That makes sense now. And yes... like the fish.No, I was just telling you to shut your pie hole because you were stepping into a thread about Macs with an "it's just a stupid Mac" comment....much like Gabe in the PA comic I linked to. Tangental reference at best, but I thought it appropriate.
Codding? Like, with fish?do actual codding of a PC...
Venom: Haven't we all?
#8
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:27 PM
Wow. You are hardcore.Oh ok... That makes sense now. And yes... like the fish.Codding? Like, with fish?do actual codding of a PC...
Edited by Carbon, 27 May 2009 - 09:29 PM.
#9
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:30 PM
#10
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:41 PM
Getting the knife in far enough is harder than you thinkWow. You are hardcore.Oh ok... That makes sense now. And yes... like the fish.Codding? Like, with fish?do actual codding of a PC...
Venom: Haven't we all?
#11
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:45 PM
A 2.0 GHz processor is weak... My BASIC HP laptop has a 2.5GHz dual core, so essentially 5 GHz or total power.
Having a dual core processor running at 2.5GHz does not, in ANY way make it even CLOSE to operating at 5GHz. Clock speed and processing power are no longer related like that. And to be honest, unless you are running some form of Linux, then your PC is being hampered by your operating system.
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?
#12
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:58 PM
Especially with Vista. Have you seen how much background crap Vista runs?A 2.0 GHz processor is weak... My BASIC HP laptop has a 2.5GHz dual core, so essentially 5 GHz or total power.
Having a dual core processor running at 2.5GHz does not, in ANY way make it even CLOSE to operating at 5GHz. Clock speed and processing power are no longer related like that. And to be honest, unless you are running some form of Linux, then your PC is being hampered by your operating system.
And yeah... I realize that now... I failed
Edited by BustaNinja, 27 May 2009 - 10:04 PM.
Venom: Haven't we all?
#13
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:13 AM
I can't say what the old Macbooks were; the only one available now is the 2.13 for $999.
As for the new Macbooks, so far as I know, there is (and have only ever been) the 2.0 ($1299) and the 2.4GHz ($1599.)
You may have possibly been looking at the 15" Macbook Pro - Macbooks only come in 13", however the Pros come in 15 and 17". 15" models are 2.4 and 2.66GHz priced at $1999 and $2499 respectively. The 17" model is 2.66GHz and $2799.
So in answer to your question, no, there has never been a 2.66GHz Macbook model, and no, they haven't bumped the price up $100 for a 'weaker' processor.
Facts and figures taken off the Apple website, but I know from experience that shops never sell at lower prices than Apples prices. Occasionally they sell higher, but never lower.
Edited by Alexiumz, 28 May 2009 - 03:15 AM.
#14
Posted 28 May 2009 - 08:55 AM
#15
Posted 28 May 2009 - 10:39 AM
http://store.apple.c...mac/family/imac
Apple have changed the processors (and prices) on the iMacs once or twice though, so it may well have been the iMacs you were thinking of.
#16
Posted 05 June 2009 - 09:07 PM
#17
Posted 05 June 2009 - 09:26 PM
Sorry, just a small bump so I didn't have to make a new thread.
First off, did you install all the things that bootcamp tells you to install? There should be a function in bootcamp that tells you to put in the install disk for the Mac OS X disk when windows is booted up. THat way, you can install all the drivers for the video card, the airport card (wireless card) bluetooth, and all the other hardware goodies on your computer.
#18
Posted 05 June 2009 - 09:49 PM
#19
Posted 05 June 2009 - 11:51 PM
#20
Posted 06 June 2009 - 07:46 PM
Koree
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users








