P.S Sorry for all the capital letters.
Edited by Betrayal, 01 February 2009 - 10:03 PM.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:03 PM
Edited by Betrayal, 01 February 2009 - 10:03 PM.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:03 PM
Edited by nerfer9, 01 February 2009 - 10:14 PM.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:14 PM
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:17 PM
Till the last five minutes it was a ten point difference...
It wasn't what I would call a good game. Yes, there were some nice plays, but there are those with any superbowl.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:35 PM
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:41 PM
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:44 PM
I agree, I can't believe the booth made a decision that quickly. Plus, if the play was ruled an incomplete pass, the Steelers' 15 yard personal foul would have still applied. The Cards would have been at like 25 with 15 seconds to go....The "fumble" near at the last 30 seconds was a load of shit! you could clearly see his arm go forward and release the ball.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 11:04 PM
Even though I was rooting for the Steelers that "fumble" seemed like bs to me. But it was an amazing game very intense.The "fumble" near at the last 30 seconds was a load of shit! you could clearly see his arm go forward and release the ball.
Posted 01 February 2009 - 11:11 PM
Posted 01 February 2009 - 11:19 PM
Posted 01 February 2009 - 11:48 PM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:04 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:12 AM
Edited by shoeshine5, 02 February 2009 - 12:12 AM.
Posted 02 February 2009 - 01:38 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 02:00 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 05:56 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 06:47 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:21 AM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 11:50 AM
Edited by boom, 02 February 2009 - 11:51 AM.
Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:04 PM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 01:08 PM
Posted 02 February 2009 - 06:03 PM
I don't have the NFL Rulebook memorized, but I'm still trying to figure this one out. (Note - I had neither emotional nor financial investment in either team, so I don't care who won or lost.)
The Cardinals were called for roughing the kicker, because a guy tripped and toppled into him after the kick. The Steelers were given a first down - retaining the ball.
The Steelers were called for roughing the kicker, because a guy who apparently has a really bad attitude problem held the guy down and shoved him numerous times after the kick. The Cardinals were awarded what amounted to a 6 inch penalty putting the Steelers nearly inside the rear endzone. (Yes, this did eventually result in that crazy Safety, but...)
Why were the penalties called in that manner? To me, the Cardinals "roughing" was uninentional, and certainly not aggravated. The Steelers, on the other hand, was quite intentional, and what I would call "flagrant" (does that exist in the NFL?). Why was the Cardinals' penalty more severe than the Steelers'?
Posted 02 February 2009 - 07:45 PM
It was intense but none of the personel fouls were any where near personal and/or intentinal(my spelling has gone to crap lately)His knees were on top of the guy trying to tackle him. Try watching it from 10 angles in high def. He was in. And you act as if the fouls were not only against the Cardinals, but that they didn't deserve them.
As for it being a "real game" - the entire game was pretty intense. I think you were watching something else.
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:02 PM
Did you watch any of the Super Bowls the Patriots were in?Dude, that was an awesome catch. Oh, and don't be sorry for Arizona, the underdogs suck ass.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users