Jump to content


Photo

Sof Seattle War

MONDAY July 20th, 2009

265 replies to this topic

#151 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 01:28 PM

Goddamnit. I just bought more LS clips too. Didn't we have a poll to decide this? Sunshine, I don't think its fair that you get to decide this just because you host W@M. If this is really the outcome then I'm going to have to go buy a RFSG. This is incredibly gay, after spending SO much time and money on my other guns.
  • 0

#152 Blacksunshine

Blacksunshine

    Member

  • Members
  • 948 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:13 PM

Goddamnit. I just bought more LS clips too. Didn't we have a poll to decide this? Sunshine, I don't think its fair that you get to decide this just because you host W@M. If this is really the outcome then I'm going to have to go buy a RFSG. This is incredibly gay, after spending SO much time and money on my other guns.


You pushing so hard to ban them completely without question or consideration is really the dick move in this thread. The plunger tube on a LS isn't much different in size then the RFSG. so mod the shit out of yours and make a superclip. Then you have nothing to complain about. Or take the 4 months that you have until the next war and put your effort into something else to build. I took the time to build my RFSG and am proud of what I built. And I'm not going to allow it to be shut out of a war simply because someone else does not own one.

Thank you for finally stating the real reason that you want them banned. You don't own one and thats why you don't want them there. Yeah that was a great reason,[Sarcasm] REAL FAIR[/Sarcasm]. If you feel that you cannot compete unless you have a RFSG then get one and stop bitching.

Like I said if they prove to be too overpowering then they will be removed. Would you then complain about that since you went out and bought one?
  • 0
Forgive my spelling and grammar. I post from my cell phone a lot. Sometimes when I'm on the can at work.

#153 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 06:06 PM

That actually wasn't the reason I wanted them banned. I believe I outlined that reason on page 2 in response to a comment from boom. I was saying maybe I should go buy them because, if they are allowed, I don't want to be outgunned. I'm not actually going to, because I don't want to spend more money on nerf at the moment. Whatever, we'll see how it goes. What I don't understand is why you suddenly have the power to decide whether they will be legal or not, when majority vote says they don't want them at the war. You're acting like I'm the only one who doesn't want them.

Edited by TantumBull, 20 March 2009 - 07:07 PM.

  • 0

#154 Blacksunshine

Blacksunshine

    Member

  • Members
  • 948 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:00 PM

That actually wasn't the reason I wanted them banned. I believe I outlined that reason on page 2 in response to a comment from boom. I was saying maybe I should go buy them because, if they are allowed, I don't want to be outgunned. I'm not actually going to, because I don't want to spend more money on nerf at the moment. Whatever, we'll see how it goes. What I don't understand is why you suddenly have the power to decide whether they will be legal or not, when majority vote says they don't want them at the war. You're acting like I'm the only one who doesn't want them.

But I'll rest my case now, because apparently you have the power to change rules at this war as you see fit without taking anyone else into consideration. And I know I haven't been to an NIC hosted war before, so I may be wrong about you being able to change stuff that was already voted on. If that's the case then just shoot me a PM and I'll delete the part of this post that accuses you of the said action.


No you're not the only one aganst them, but you ARE the one that is making a point to repeatedly voice your opinion about them being banned over and over.

All this BS here in this thread is just that BS. If they are to be banned it will be in person not over the forum here. That is fair. I didn't say I had the power to decide if it should be banned or not. But like I said. It was laid out early in this thread that it is home field rules, and I do decide the field rules for W@M. So yes I am kind of pulling an executive move here and saying that their legality will not be decided in this thread. And not simply because you don't have one or want to go buy one and think that they decide the game. They are just a blaster. If you don't think thats fair I don't know what else to say. I'm bringing mine.


If I mod an AT4K and it hits 100' will that also get banned? Where does this end? I can accept banning a gun for safety reasons, that is reasonable and understandable. But banning a gun because you think its too good and don't want/know how to make one/lack time/whatever is dumb.

So again. If a blaster is found to be too overpowering regardless of what it is then it is only fair that it be removed from the game. Considering that springers can be modded to different levels based on skill of the modder it is unreasonable to place a sweeping ban on any single blaser. And should be considered as a per situation. If mine only gets 50' of range are you going to still say that its too powerful? Of course not. Blasters will be banned on the basis of consistent excessive performance resulting in injury or unbalancing of the play field not because of the type of blaster.

Now what I will say is I'm sorry for not just stepping in and laying it out like this earlier in the thread. But your repeated posting in outcry against the blaster really finally got on my nerves.

Edited by Blacksunshine, 20 March 2009 - 07:02 PM.

  • 0
Forgive my spelling and grammar. I post from my cell phone a lot. Sometimes when I'm on the can at work.

#155 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:05 PM

Alright, that's fine. I didn't realize you had executive power, I wouldn't have made the poll if I did.
  • 0

#156 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:48 PM

Tantum, I think you will find that most NIC wars are either a dictatorship or an oligarchy, and there is little voting going on. I realize that I have a vested interest in using RFS's, but like BS said, I've put a fair amount of effort in to it, and I would like to use it. I haven't gotten to use it in a war at all, so it's not like I'm going to be awesome with it anyway. I have plenty of other blasters that I want to play with, and I am not just going to use the RFS all day, either. I'll certainly let anyone else try it out if they would like. I've had so many different blasters that I haven't gotten to play with, that I won't be limiting myself to one. Besides, the games are not about owning everyone on the field. They are about having fun.
So don't freak out, it will all be okay, and we'll all have fun. Build your Longshot, and maybe you will get a drum magazine before the war?
I'm serious about the new blaster, though. I am having trouble with it blowing the breech five feet out the front, though. I need to build a lock for the barrel. You guys are going to hate me.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#157 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:52 PM

You guys are right, my apologies if anything I said poked offense.

On a completely different note, would anyone be interested in an awesomely couplered but horribly painted SS2? There's a write up in my sig. The reason its so crappily painted is because I didn't get to finish it before my heart started acting up (search "arithmea" if you wanna hear the whole story).

Edited by TantumBull, 20 March 2009 - 07:52 PM.

  • 0

#158 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:59 PM

On a completely different note, would anyone be interested in an awesomely couplered but horribly painted SS2? There's a write up in my sig. The reason its so crappily painted is because I didn't get to finish it before my heart started acting up (search "arithmea" if you wanna hear the whole story).


Oh, right! I remember reading about that. It had to do with you huffing paint, right? J/K... Hmmm... Maybe I should edit the first post to try and include a list of things people are definitely bringing to trade? I don't know. You might just want to set those trades up prior to the war, I guess.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#159 Renegademilitia15

Renegademilitia15

    Member

  • Members
  • 516 posts

Posted 20 March 2009 - 11:29 PM

On a completely different note, would anyone be interested in an awesomely couplered but horribly painted SS2? There's a write up in my sig. The reason its so crappily painted is because I didn't get to finish it before my heart started acting up (search "arithmea" if you wanna hear the whole story).


I might be interested. How much do you want for it? I don't really want to offer anything for the sake of offending you.

edit: tried to look at your SS2 mod, but the pics are not working. Just to confirm, its the red pistol that gets sm750 ranges right?

Edited by Renegademilitia15, 20 March 2009 - 11:31 PM.

  • 0
Singled RFS
FA_24's response to Ice's back pain thread:
QUOTE

I used to have that problem until I got circumcised. 15 pounds later I was able to stand up straight.

#160 Retiate

Retiate

    Member

  • Members
  • 778 posts

Posted 21 March 2009 - 02:33 AM

Okay, I just got done looking through the thread for twenty minutes, and I don't a single post stating that we are going to run the war off "home field rules".
I thought the voting system worked out the best. It's best to appeal to the masses, and that's exactly what we were doing. If you want to bring your RSFGs to test them out at the war, then I think that's alright. But I don't think they should be automatically legal just because we voted to have the war at the same place W@M is hosted.

If it's assumed that we're having home field rules, does that mean you are going to allow shields? Because I'm sure as hell there will be an overwhelming majority vote against that.
Once again, I think we should just bring them to the war, then give them some test shots. Then we will vote again. People who are still against them will stand on one side, and the people for them will stand on the other. I'd say that's much more fair than a single person deciding what goes.
  • 0

#161 Blacksunshine

Blacksunshine

    Member

  • Members
  • 948 posts

Posted 21 March 2009 - 03:57 AM

Okay, I just got done looking through the thread for twenty minutes, and I don't a single post stating that we are going to run the war off "home field rules".
I thought the voting system worked out the best. It's best to appeal to the masses, and that's exactly what we were doing. If you want to bring your RSFGs to test them out at the war, then I think that's alright. But I don't think they should be automatically legal just because we voted to have the war at the same place W@M is hosted.

If it's assumed that we're having home field rules, does that mean you are going to allow shields? Because I'm sure as hell there will be an overwhelming majority vote against that.
Once again, I think we should just bring them to the war, then give them some test shots. Then we will vote again. People who are still against them will stand on one side, and the people for them will stand on the other. I'd say that's much more fair than a single person deciding what goes.


Right, it's gonna Go down like this. SOFnos are gonna be run under Mostly Local rules... of course we're also gonna share with you some of the Ways We SoCalers play too... (mainly our specialized games) but that's beyond that point.


This isn't a single person saying that they will be legal. this is a single person shooting down this premptive online vote against them that is all. They should be allowed at least long enough to determine if all this hubbub was all for nothing. If after a round or two everyone still feels the same about them then we can vote them out and I will be happy to swap out to a different blaster. Its just kind of stupid to globally ban them because there are a couple horribly overbuilt ones.

Shields? Again, I will probably bring mine.If you have one you should too. Maybe we can make up some way to incorporate them into a game.
  • 0
Forgive my spelling and grammar. I post from my cell phone a lot. Sometimes when I'm on the can at work.

#162 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 21 March 2009 - 11:47 AM

People who are still against them will stand on one side, and the people for them will stand on the other...


And shoot the naysayers. :) Sounds fair to me!
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#163 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 21 March 2009 - 01:51 PM

I might be interested. How much do you want for it? I don't really want to offer anything for the sake of offending you.

edit: tried to look at your SS2 mod, but the pics are not working. Just to confirm, its the red pistol that gets sm750 ranges right?


Yep, that's the one. I''ve been looking around and it seems that a fully functioning SS2 goes for about 25 bucks. Would 20 be about good because of the shit paintjob? You can decide once photobucket unlocks my photos later this month. Then I'll upload a picture of the shell, and you can see the mod in my sig.

Edit: I forgot to say that one side of the shell looks good. The other is just messy. I you wanted to buy the gun for 25 I could throw in the spray paint that I used. That's only if you like the color scheme.

Edited by TantumBull, 21 March 2009 - 01:53 PM.

  • 0

#164 Renegademilitia15

Renegademilitia15

    Member

  • Members
  • 516 posts

Posted 22 March 2009 - 01:44 PM

I might be interested. How much do you want for it? I don't really want to offer anything for the sake of offending you.

edit: tried to look at your SS2 mod, but the pics are not working. Just to confirm, its the red pistol that gets sm750 ranges right?


Yep, that's the one. I''ve been looking around and it seems that a fully functioning SS2 goes for about 25 bucks. Would 20 be about good because of the shit paintjob? You can decide once photobucket unlocks my photos later this month. Then I'll upload a picture of the shell, and you can see the mod in my sig.

Edit: I forgot to say that one side of the shell looks good. The other is just messy. I you wanted to buy the gun for 25 I could throw in the spray paint that I used. That's only if you like the color scheme.


That sounds pretty good to me. I might get a couple 2k spacer plates from you too while I'm at it.

edit: I just actually read the part about the paint.
There is really no need to give me the paint, as I have adequate supplies of painting material myself.

edit again: I saw the write up, looks pretty groovy. I can't wait.

Edited by Renegademilitia15, 23 March 2009 - 01:06 PM.

  • 0
Singled RFS
FA_24's response to Ice's back pain thread:
QUOTE

I used to have that problem until I got circumcised. 15 pounds later I was able to stand up straight.

#165 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 22 March 2009 - 02:23 PM

Okay, so 20 bucks? And the write up is working now, so if you want you can go and check it out.

Edit: About the spacers, you get one neon green one for free, but then more you have to buy.

Edited by TantumBull, 22 March 2009 - 02:24 PM.

  • 0

#166 Disturbed

Disturbed

    Member

  • Members
  • 133 posts

Posted 22 March 2009 - 08:45 PM

We should totally have a pistols VS shields and swords round or a primaries VS shields and pistols.

Like many wars, you bring your guns and we do a range/power test. If people say "ah hell no!" then we don't allow them.
  • 0
If you nerf in Washington, I am a host of SANO, Seattle Area Nerf Out. PM me, would love to add you to the Washington nerf crew.

#167 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 24 March 2009 - 06:33 PM

Another question regarding gun legality for cheapness reasons... would a sm1.5k hooked up to a backpack tank be allowed?
  • 0

#168 Gazoo

Gazoo

    Member

  • Members
  • 121 posts

Posted 24 March 2009 - 08:54 PM

Another question regarding gun legality for cheapness reasons... would a sm1.5k hooked up to a backpack tank be allowed?


I'm guessing it's going to be like all the rest. Bring it, Range test it, and if it's way too overpowering, it's gonna be a no...
  • 0
QUOTE
groove- Blatant asshattery will not be tolerated

#169 Retiate

Retiate

    Member

  • Members
  • 778 posts

Posted 24 March 2009 - 08:55 PM

I have never seen anyone use one, or even heard of one, so I'd say bring it and test it out. I'm sure most people would say the same.
  • 0

#170 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:42 PM

I'm fine with it. Most people don't realize (mainly because nobody installs pressure gauges) that plugged pump blaster regularly hit pressures like 50, 60, 70PSI, just like you might run an external tank at.

Oh, and since you will probably want to know.... Carquest had tire pressure gauges for less than $3, but they have a straight thread which is roughly the same as 1/8" NPT. Walmart has them for $5, but they are equipped with standard 1/8" NPT.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#171 Dayko

Dayko

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,037 posts

Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:44 PM

We can keep going around and around about what should be banned and what shouldn't be banned. Here is a suggestion: How about 9:00 through 9:30 we will range test all the questionable blasters. If your late then don't bother asking because your blaster is automatically banned. Lets focus on how kick ass this war will be.

Edited by Dayko, 25 March 2009 - 02:12 PM.

  • 0

< One foot in death...The other in life. >
 


#172 Renegademilitia15

Renegademilitia15

    Member

  • Members
  • 516 posts

Posted 01 April 2009 - 09:56 AM

An excuse to bump:

Would anybody be interested in a modified, minimized sonic bazooka?.......Please?.......

Edited by Renegademilitia15, 02 April 2009 - 12:02 AM.

  • 0
Singled RFS
FA_24's response to Ice's back pain thread:
QUOTE

I used to have that problem until I got circumcised. 15 pounds later I was able to stand up straight.

#173 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts

Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:15 PM

Does anyone here use 1/4" slingshot ammo for weights. I have 750 of 'em up for grabs and I'll sell them lower than market value. I ordered them off of Amazon a while back and then decided on a different weight.

Edited by TantumBull, 07 April 2009 - 05:15 PM.

  • 0

#174 Grenada

Grenada

    Member

  • Members
  • 105 posts

Posted 08 April 2009 - 07:01 PM

Just for the weapons testing, possibly have the person who is using the gun in question stand 50 feet(roughly) from someone who is firing the gun. If they are not going to agree to it, that gun is auto-banned.

Another thing, are homemade melee weapons allowed(A.K.A. my series of BAN-hammers) allowed?

Put me and up to 2 others as confirmed

Bomberman is a hopeful right now

Edited by Grenada, 08 April 2009 - 07:16 PM.

  • 0
If you Nerf in western washington, PM me

So you see a penguin walking down the street. Looks harmless right, so you keep on walking past him. You turn around to seem him walk away, only to find yourself staring down the barrel of a .38 revolver.

#175 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 08 April 2009 - 07:47 PM

Just for the weapons testing, possibly have the person who is using the gun in question stand 50 feet(roughly) from someone who is firing the gun. If they are not going to agree to it, that gun is auto-banned.


I like your style!

Another thing, are homemade melee weapons allowed(A.K.A. my series of BAN-hammers) allowed?


We haven't spoken about melee weapons much, but there seems to be some interest in it. Myself, I don't mind, but personally hadn't planned on using one.

Put me and up to 2 others as confirmed
Bomberman is a hopeful right now


Noted.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users