Jump to content


Photo

Singled Ls Help.

Different problem!

10 replies to this topic

#1 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 14 January 2009 - 04:40 PM

OK, so I have two singled Ls's. One fires great the other sucks ass.
The one that works best is the one I did first. The second one gets horrible ranges. I've tried swapping internals, except for te part in the plunger tube that is made f PVC and CPVC. I have to have Half a bbb spring, a 1st gen NF spring, and a Ls spring to get ranges that are even comparable to singled Ls ranges. Is it possible to leaks. I know its not the Etape, it has a good fit.

Any suggestions?
  • 0

#2 umpshaplapa

umpshaplapa

    Member

  • Members
  • 636 posts
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 14 January 2009 - 04:45 PM

Are you saying when you switched the internals the bad set got better?
  • 0
QUOTE(Talio @ Jun 29 2009, 01:50 PM) View Post

i got a black belt in noob banning in 2004.


#3 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 14 January 2009 - 04:47 PM

No, I'm saying there was no improvement.
  • 0

#4 Draconis

Draconis

    I am not Lord Draconical

  • Members
  • 2,712 posts
  • NerfHaven Subscription Supporter
  • Location:Salem, Oregon
  • State:Oregon
  • Country:United States
  • u/Parabolictoys on Reddit

Posted 14 January 2009 - 05:06 PM

Detailed pictures of the malfunctioning unit would help a LOT.
  • 0
[15:51] <+Noodle> titties
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?

#5 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 14 January 2009 - 05:31 PM

Thats the thing, there are NO viable differences between the funtional and non-funtional guns. Its a pain in the ass that it won't coperate.
  • 0

#6 TantumBull

TantumBull

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,929 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • State:Washington
  • Country:United States
  • u/LukeKoboJobo on Reddit

Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:23 PM

If you switched the internals and the internals that previously sucked don't suck in a different shell, then its obviously a problem with the shell.
  • 0

#7 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:36 PM

If you switched the internals and the internals that previously sucked don't suck in a different shell, then its obviously a problem with the shell.


No that set of internals suck. But the plunger tube, plunger rod, and plunger head are both the same. Like I said, is it possible to have leaks with the homemade part made of PVC and CPVC, BUT! not through the E-tape?
  • 0

#8 umpshaplapa

umpshaplapa

    Member

  • Members
  • 636 posts
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:58 PM

Are you sure you sealed the gap between the PVC and CPVC well?
  • 0
QUOTE(Talio @ Jun 29 2009, 01:50 PM) View Post

i got a black belt in noob banning in 2004.


#9 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 14 January 2009 - 07:10 PM

I hammered the cpvc coupler into the 3/4" pvc. Its a tight fit. I don't think it would really cause that much air loss. It might, an I'll get it on my next trip inside, but I want to see everything I need to check.
  • 0

#10 LoneNerfer

LoneNerfer

    Member

  • Members
  • 86 posts

Posted 14 January 2009 - 09:43 PM

How far back is the plunger rod when it isn't cocked there shouldn't be any space in between it and the back of the plunger tube. If there is space there you might have to cut bolt smalller ( the thing you pull back to cock the gun).
  • 0

#11 xtremejumpy

xtremejumpy

    Member

  • Members
  • 299 posts
  • Location:Huntsville, AL

Posted 15 January 2009 - 04:44 PM

theres a bit of space, but it dosent do anything bad to my other one.
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users