~nrg
Edited by nerfnrg, 17 November 2008 - 10:46 PM.
Posted 17 November 2008 - 10:46 PM
Edited by nerfnrg, 17 November 2008 - 10:46 PM.
Posted 17 November 2008 - 10:52 PM
Posted 17 November 2008 - 11:25 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 07:17 AM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 07:46 AM
I'd agree with most of what he said here. The perks are pretty much the same, which is stupid. It isn't entirely 4 wih a WWII makeover, because all of the weapons are different, which makes a huge difference. In COD 4 it was like "hmm, should I get this machine gun or this machine gun?" There wasn't a whole lot of variety out there. Plus losing sucked. But in world at war theres rifles, losers, machine guns, etc. and there's actually variety. Plus the maps are different.Its actually just Call of Duty: World At War
It is NOT call of duty 5.
Activision does not own the rights to make the number titled COD games. Infinity Ward does.
This game is a straight up COD4 with a WWII skin. The open online demo was fun for a while, but tanks are pretty dumb, and basically its the same thing. Not that this is bad, but I just don't think it is original at all. I must say the flamethrowers and dogs are pretty cool though.
Posted 18 November 2008 - 03:24 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:09 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:14 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 06:08 PM
Is it out for PC? I thought it was only out for 360 right now.
I played it on 360 and it was pretty cool. Don't throw away COD4 yet though. I still play both, WaW wasn't meant to replace COD4, It's like a WW2 variant of it.
Posted 18 November 2008 - 06:14 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 06:16 PM
Posted 18 November 2008 - 06:23 PM
Yeah.......HEY THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED WALMART!!!!!They have it for the DS?!?!?!?!?!
Posted 18 November 2008 - 08:17 PM
Posted 19 November 2008 - 08:50 AM
Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:06 PM
Posted 19 November 2008 - 05:17 PM
Posted 24 November 2008 - 03:55 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users