#1
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:52 PM
Nerf on!
#2
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:00 PM
Not in the game anymore, but it was great while it lasted. Thanks for the great years of fun, NH!
--
Resident "Spawn of Talio"
#3
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:03 PM
#4
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:19 PM
Edited by THIRST, 17 January 2004 - 07:20 PM.
#5
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:21 PM
#6
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:23 PM
Nerf on!
#7
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:27 PM
Not in the game anymore, but it was great while it lasted. Thanks for the great years of fun, NH!
--
Resident "Spawn of Talio"
#8
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:27 PM
#9
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:34 PM
#10
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:38 PM
But I find that a hole in back makes a 10-15ft. increace on my range.
#11
Posted 17 January 2004 - 07:41 PM
Nerf on!
#12
Posted 17 January 2004 - 08:59 PM
And when I did experiment with it, the ones with holes got 10-15 ft. less feet.
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#13
Posted 17 January 2004 - 11:49 PM
Short story: the holes didn't help.
#14
Posted 17 January 2004 - 11:53 PM
I have done tests with holes and no holes, and in my experience, the ones while holes do better, and here is my theory:
When air is shot through the barrel, and you have a dart with no hole, the force being applied is on the back of the dart. Next, when the dart comes out, the force does not want to stay in the back of the dart anymore, since there is no barrel to force it to. This will destabalize the back end of the dart and it will lose it's aerodynamics because it is now flying at a bit of an angle.
On the other hand, when you have a dart with a hole in the back (a deep cylindrical hole, not a simple V shaped hole via a hot glue gun), the air is injected into the dart. Now where is the force? The force is inside the dart, and it is pushing on the front of the dart. It is more aerodynamically stable to have force pushing in the front of a dart, than the back. Also, since the air is trapped in the dart, the force stays with the dart longer.
I have tested this theory many times. The explanation why may not be 100% correct, but I know the results are. Darts with holes outperform those without. Also, I am talking about deep cylindrical holes. You get those by taking a drinking straw and use a twisting motion. Then you get needle nose pliers and take out the cylinder of foam.
Hope this helps.
Doin' coke, drinkin' beers, Drinkin' beers beers beers
Rollin' fatties, Smokin' blunts
Who smokes the blunts? We smoke the blunts
-Jay
#15
Posted 18 January 2004 - 01:27 AM
Micro Stefan Comparison
Man, I was a cocky bastard when I first joined the NIC.
Guess things never change.
#16
Posted 18 January 2004 - 10:32 AM
I suppose what ever works best for you.
Edited by xedice, 18 January 2004 - 10:36 AM.
Doin' coke, drinkin' beers, Drinkin' beers beers beers
Rollin' fatties, Smokin' blunts
Who smokes the blunts? We smoke the blunts
-Jay
#17
Posted 18 January 2004 - 02:16 PM
#18
Posted 18 January 2004 - 06:42 PM
That article was very helpful! It is the first one I have seen that actually covers the various types of stefans. Thanks Cxwq!In case you weren't around a few years ago when I originally posted this analysis...
Micro Stefan Comparison
Man, I was a cocky bastard when I first joined the NIC.
Guess things never change.
Nerf on!
#19
Posted 18 January 2004 - 06:59 PM
From my experience, the darts remain the same size as before, allowing use in the same barrels as their chunky bretheren. This core removal can also increase the effect of a tip weight's dart balancing effect, allowing lighter weights, with the same accuracy as heavier weights. Point in case: I reduced my Zero darts to a single steel BB, versus a size 7 fishing weight, with little range loss, and no accuracy loss at all (full bodied darts with the same light weight are eccentric).
I'd publish a test, but there's no motivation for that.
- Death
#20
Posted 18 January 2004 - 07:13 PM
Are you saying that a single BB isn't enought weight for my two inch micro stefans?Point in case: I reduced my Zero darts to a single steel BB, versus a size 7 fishing weight, with little range loss, and no accuracy loss at all (full bodied darts with the same light weight are eccentric).
Nerf on!
#21
Posted 19 January 2004 - 08:37 PM
#22
Posted 19 January 2004 - 08:44 PM
Well, I use my big glue gun to make the first hole, and then I take my little one and make a little bit of a deeper hole, and then I'm done.Who does the "Glue Gun <cone in back>" and who does the "Nail or straw." I've found those to be some detirmaning factors also. In my expirence the no hole and nail or straw did about the same. But the Glue Gun was more accurate and had about a 5 foot advantage.
I don't know, but with my darts, the hole makes the darts better. They fly straighter, and go a little bit farther. I honestly don't know if it will be the same for everyone else.
Not in the game anymore, but it was great while it lasted. Thanks for the great years of fun, NH!
--
Resident "Spawn of Talio"
#23
Posted 19 January 2004 - 09:01 PM
#24
Posted 19 January 2004 - 09:12 PM
Edited by Nerfer16, 19 January 2004 - 09:12 PM.
Nerf on!
#25
Posted 19 January 2004 - 09:30 PM
the weight blew out on one dart
they were not poorly made
You just contradicted yourself. If the weights blow out, theyre either really old, or poorly made.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users