Edited by nat, 16 August 2008 - 11:40 AM.
Hornet And Bs Blast Chambers?
#1
Posted 15 August 2008 - 08:34 PM
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#2
Posted 15 August 2008 - 11:16 PM
#3
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:02 AM
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#4
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:49 AM
Dump Valve Blasters: SuperMaxx Line and AirTech Line. The tanks are all pretty much the same, but the trigger mech varies slightly. Titan, Big Blast, Blast Bazooka, Mega Missile Blaster and a plethora of others. The dump valve means you're actually pulling (via a firing pin attached to the trigger) the valve back (which is pressed and sealed against the front/barrel opening of the air tank). A solid design and lasts a long time. Also, the higher the pressure and the larger the dump valve opening, the harder it shoots and the harder it is to pull back the trigger.
"Blast Chamber" Blasters (as they've come to be called) or Back Pressure Valves: Big Salvo, Hornet, Blast Fire, Triple Fire, and a few others. These work on back pressure and can all use the same trigger system. As long as the trigger allows air to flow back away from the blast chambers they will fire. No matter how big the tank or high the pressure, it's not difficult to pull/push the trigger, but the design isn't as durable as and more prone to leaks than Dump Valve Blasters. Also, Lightning Blitz, Secret Shot 2, and a few others. These get their own category, because while they work on back pressure, their trigger systems are not inner-changeable. The reason for this is that the air does comes in one place with a check valve in the tank and the firing valve (back pressure valve) is in a different spot. The SplitFire gets its own category because there isn't much like it in the foam world. I'm not exactly sure how the trigger allows back pressure, but it does (anybody ever disected or seen into a SplitFire before? Just curious.)
Those two categories cover the majority of blast chambers in NERF blasters. If anybody can think of other types, let me know. It would be good to compile all these things in one place.
#5
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:56 AM
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#6
Posted 16 August 2008 - 09:22 AM
Thank you very much, I was actually going to make a topic to ask this today. The smdtg's valves fall into this category aswell. On another note, were there any guns that used multiple dump valves? Likewise, were there any guns that used single back pressure valves? I see no real advantage in using a single back pressure, but many in using multiple dump valves.NO!
Dump Valve Blasters: SuperMaxx Line and AirTech Line. The tanks are all pretty much the same, but the trigger mech varies slightly. Titan, Big Blast, Blast Bazooka, Mega Missile Blaster and a plethora of others. The dump valve means you're actually pulling (via a firing pin attached to the trigger) the valve back (which is pressed and sealed against the front/barrel opening of the air tank). A solid design and lasts a long time. Also, the higher the pressure and the larger the dump valve opening, the harder it shoots and the harder it is to pull back the trigger.
"Blast Chamber" Blasters (as they've come to be called) or Back Pressure Valves: Big Salvo, Hornet, Blast Fire, Triple Fire, and a few others. These work on back pressure and can all use the same trigger system. As long as the trigger allows air to flow back away from the blast chambers they will fire. No matter how big the tank or high the pressure, it's not difficult to pull/push the trigger, but the design isn't as durable as and more prone to leaks than Dump Valve Blasters. Also, Lightning Blitz, Secret Shot 2, and a few others. These get their own category, because while they work on back pressure, their trigger systems are not inner-changeable. The reason for this is that the air does comes in one place with a check valve in the tank and the firing valve (back pressure valve) is in a different spot. The SplitFire gets its own category because there isn't much like it in the foam world. I'm not exactly sure how the trigger allows back pressure, but it does (anybody ever disected or seen into a SplitFire before? Just curious.)
Those two categories cover the majority of blast chambers in NERF blasters. If anybody can think of other types, let me know. It would be good to compile all these things in one place.
Edited by doubleshot, 16 August 2008 - 09:25 AM.
#7
Posted 16 August 2008 - 12:23 PM
Hmm...I'm becoming more interested in these things all the time. How hard is the trigger pull on these things?The National Geographic is sort of a hybrid, as far as those categorizations go.
Its valve is of the back pressure type, such that chamber pressure throws it open quickly, but it is held closed by a mechanical block, instead of by back pressure in another chamber. The trigger knocks the block out of the way, allowing chamber pressure to throw the valve open. When the trigger is released (and the pressure has dropped), the trigger spring pushes the block back into place.
I'm not sure what you're asking...but you do get four big salvo chambers per gun. Are you asking if you can make bigger blast chambers...you could, but I don't know how much benefit it would be. I don't if the flow rate would be great enough to take advantage of more air.But I don't want to buy two Big Salvos so could a just make bigger ones?
Thank you very much, I was actually going to make a topic to ask this today. The smdtg's valves fall into this category aswell. On another note, were there any guns that used multiple dump valves? Likewise, were there any guns that used single back pressure valves? I see no real advantage in using a single back pressure, but many in using multiple dump valves.
Secret Shot 2 and Lightning Blitz both have a single back pressure valve. I don't know of any blasters with multiple dump valves (Arachnophobia II not included). It gets pretty complicated to have multiple dump valves with a single trigger. I've played with some designs, but before I got into it too heavily, I came up with the Marvelous Salvo, and in my opinion, that precludes the need for multiple dump valves. Necessity is the mother of invention, and I no longer feel the need for multiple dump valves. And as far as advantage for single back pressure, I'm not sure if they have a faster flow rate, but they seem to attain better ranges.
Edited by imaseoulman, 16 August 2008 - 12:25 PM.
#8
Posted 16 August 2008 - 01:10 PM
Thats exactly what I'm asking. But I don't know how the insides work so could someone please tell me.Are you asking if you can make bigger blast chambers
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#9
Posted 16 August 2008 - 05:02 PM

In the first phase (A) air coming into the blaster pushes the stopper forward, sealing off the barrel end. Air continues to flow in and compress ( B ). When the trigger is actuated, air is allowed to flow back out (usually the trigger opens a valve somewhere) and the stopper is sucked back © which opens the other end of the blast chamber and the air then rushes out through the barrel. Hope that made sense.
Now, for expanding this, yes you could do a tank expansion, but as I mentioned earlier, I don't know if the flow rate is great enough to allow for more air to get through quickly enough to create any significant increase in power. You can try it and experiment and let us know. Personally, I think the Big Salvo blast chambers have enough power already.
Edit: I had to keep changing the spacing on the ( B ) because those blasted smilies kept showing up!
Edited by imaseoulman, 16 August 2008 - 05:04 PM.
#10
Posted 16 August 2008 - 05:26 PM
Edited by nat, 16 August 2008 - 05:27 PM.
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#11
Posted 16 August 2008 - 09:02 PM

If I cut a pencil eraser sized hole in a Hornet blast chamber and glued a small Pvc tank on It would that increase the pressure build up in it. Sorta like above, I used imaseoulman's picture and edited it a little so you could get an idea. Yeah I saw oodalumps's Awesome maagstrike mod Ad that gave me this idea. I thought if He can do It to a piston I could probably do it to a blast chamber.
Sorry for The small picture
Edited by nat, 16 August 2008 - 09:02 PM.
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#12
Posted 16 August 2008 - 09:50 PM
If I cut a pencil eraser sized hole in a Hornet blast chamber and glued a small Pvc tank on It would that increase the pressure build up in it. Sorta like above, I used imaseoulman's picture and edited it a little so you could get an idea. Yeah I saw oodalumps's Awesome maagstrike mod Ad that gave me this idea. I thought if He can do It to a piston I could probably do it to a blast chamber.
Sorry for The small picture
I don't know much about blast chambers, but I do know that if that did work, you would definitely have to make sure those tank extensions were glued on DAMN good.
Probably dead by now, or something.
#13
Posted 16 August 2008 - 10:09 PM
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#14
Posted 17 August 2008 - 01:56 PM
#15
Posted 19 August 2008 - 08:26 AM
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#16
Posted 19 August 2008 - 10:19 AM
Edited by nat, 19 August 2008 - 10:22 AM.
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#17
Posted 19 August 2008 - 12:07 PM
Not usually. Sometimes it works, but not usually.Can PVC pipe and the plastic Nerf guns are made of be solvent welded together?
#18
Posted 19 August 2008 - 12:41 PM
[15:51] <+Rhadamanthys> titties
[15:51] <+jakejagan> titties
[15:51] <+Lucian> boobs
[15:51] <+Gears> titties
[15:51] <@Draconis> Titties.
[15:52] <+Noodle> why is this so hard?
#19
Posted 19 August 2008 - 12:48 PM
Edited by nat, 19 August 2008 - 01:55 PM.
I pitty you foo! ~MR. T
#20
Posted 19 August 2008 - 01:37 PM
You can poop in my toilet anytime champ.
2016 Nerf War Schedule
Bless you, my son. Now recite 3 New Members Guides and 5 Code of Conducts for your sins.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users








