Is This A Good Computer?
#1
Posted 05 December 2003 - 09:33 AM
Nerf World Order Clan Website
#2
Posted 05 December 2003 - 09:47 AM
#3
Posted 05 December 2003 - 12:42 PM
Nerf World Order Clan Website
#4
Posted 05 December 2003 - 02:15 PM
of Mag-7
East Coast Nerf 2009: Quid pro quo, douchebags!
#5
Posted 05 December 2003 - 03:07 PM
#6
Posted 05 December 2003 - 03:47 PM
He's right, good card for price, but not very good. Want a good card for a reasonable price?ATI® Radeon™ 9600XT 128Mb DDR AGP DVI. That's one sick card. Sells on PC Canada for $264.99. It's my next card... I can't wait to unwrap that baby and stick in my case.The Ge4 is a nice card for the price, but it won't be able to keep up with the absolute latest games.
And I don't really know if your computer is very good... like others before me, I ask, please list the specifications of this computer. Thanks.
SB is out.
http://cam-m.cjb.net
#7
Posted 05 December 2003 - 03:49 PM
#8
Posted 05 December 2003 - 03:51 PM
http://cam-m.cjb.net
#9
Posted 05 December 2003 - 04:16 PM
#10
Posted 05 December 2003 - 08:46 PM
Specs:
- FIC A98P RADEON 9800 Pro 128MB
- Pentium 4/ 3.0C GHz 800MHz FSB
- ABIT 875P Motherboard for Socket 478 800MHz Canterwood Model "IC7-Max3"
- Corsair XMS Extreme Memory Speed Series, (Twin Pack) 184 Pin 512MBx2 Registered DDR PC-3200 w/ Platinum-Silver Heat Spreader
- Hitachi 200GB 7200RPM IDE Internal Hard Drive
- Sony DW-U14A Black DVD+/-RW Recorder Drive
- Antec 480W Power Supply TRUE480
- Black Cheiftec case with door-window in side
- Green cathode voice activated lighting
- 4 fans (2 green w/ LED's and 2 clear)
- 19" viewsonic flatscreen monitor
- Logitech Wireless Mouse-Keyboard combo
I can't wait to get it and put it together, I'm going to make such sweet, sweet lo......errrr...I'll finally be able to play all the latest games at uber speeds!
Edited by neonerfer, 05 December 2003 - 08:49 PM.
#11
Posted 05 December 2003 - 09:40 PM
#12
Posted 05 December 2003 - 10:21 PM
http://cam-m.cjb.net
#13
Posted 05 December 2003 - 11:04 PM
If you go by clock speed, the Athelon 2800XP be less than the P4 3.0That is one expensive machine... looks like it's worth it though. Honestly, I would go for AMD CPUs, Intel never really did it for me. I'm getting a AMD Athelon 2800XP, which is the equivilent of your Pentium 4 3.0 I believe. Anyone seen the price on the AMD Athelon 64 CPU?!?! HOLY CRAP! One expensive little box, but it does wonders...
I have a Geforce4 Ti4400, and I have to disagree with NeoNerfer. The card is much much more than able to keep up with the latest games, I just installed Max Payne 2 and I can run it on the highest possible graphics settings. If you believe that a 6-month old card is inable to compete with new graphics technology, you're just falling into the marketing scheme that they use. The Geforce4 series will be able to run the newest best games until at the earliest a year from now, and I'd be willing to bet it can run them at the highest settings until middle of next year.
#14
Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:11 AM
As I told you already, nice machine![*]Black Cheiftec case with door-window in side
Maybe it's just cause I've built 50+ machines using Chieftec/Antec cases in the last three years, but aren't those cases just the most boring things in the world?
My latest machine is built in this AMS case ($40 at NewEgg) which is extremely well made and nice to work with.
High-gloss automotive style paint job with an acrylic panel over the front. The finish really has to be seen to be appreciated. I took the acrylic panel off and printed out some wallpaper to go under it. Window kits are cheap and you can throw a 120mm fan in the middle of the window right over your video card.
Regarding Intel vs AMD, Intel is the current performance champ and that matters when you're building a machine like this. That said, if you could save a few hundred bucks (I don't know what they run right now) by dropping down to an Athlon 2800 and Socket-A mobo, I'd jump on that in a second.
#15
Posted 06 December 2003 - 03:43 AM
On a side note, I built a pretty decent system last year for around 800, 2400 athlon xp, 512 memory, 80 gig harddrive, geforce 4 ti 4400 128mb card and all. To my dismay i saw an add for a day after tahnksgiving sale for a 2.4 gig p4, 80 gig harddrive and 512 memory for 200 bucks. Sigh* You can never win I sapose.
#16
Posted 06 December 2003 - 09:59 AM
-Howie
#17
Posted 06 December 2003 - 10:03 AM
...
But then you lose the sense of customation. Err...
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#18
Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:42 PM
I'm not sure if it was that one daedarus. The one i was talking about was 199 without screen, 300 with. Thats a shame you didn't get it though. It seemed like the 200 dollar one would have been awesome with some of my parts added in, for that price at least.
Edited by superadaquabat, 06 December 2003 - 12:44 PM.
#19
Posted 06 December 2003 - 12:54 PM
Yeah, you're right. I was thinking this machine had a Geforce 4, but it actually has a Geforce 2 64MB. My card can't keep up with the latest games, the Geforce 4 probably will be able to keep up for a while. The true test is will the Geforce 4 run Half-Life 2? I don't even think my computer will be good enough to run that game...If you go by clock speed, the Athelon 2800XP be less than the P4 3.0That is one expensive machine... looks like it's worth it though. Honestly, I would go for AMD CPUs, Intel never really did it for me. I'm getting a AMD Athelon 2800XP, which is the equivilent of your Pentium 4 3.0 I believe. Anyone seen the price on the AMD Athelon 64 CPU?!?! HOLY CRAP! One expensive little box, but it does wonders...
I have a Geforce4 Ti4400, and I have to disagree with NeoNerfer. The card is much much more than able to keep up with the latest games, I just installed Max Payne 2 and I can run it on the highest possible graphics settings. If you believe that a 6-month old card is inable to compete with new graphics technology, you're just falling into the marketing scheme that they use. The Geforce4 series will be able to run the newest best games until at the earliest a year from now, and I'd be willing to bet it can run them at the highest settings until middle of next year.
Edited by neonerfer, 06 December 2003 - 12:55 PM.
#20
Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:05 PM
Well, at least on my computer, it's a hell of a lot faster than IE. The tabs, like you said, are really great and functional.Whats so good about Safari?
I do. It's compadible with AIM, so I can chat with anyone I want to. Simple. Have you seen AV though? Much much MUCH better....and who uses iChat?
*Sniff...* So true...I love the 23" HD Cinema Display...I would recomend getting one of those huge screens though.
Oh, come on. It's not THAT bad....bug-infested virtual-pc.
Edited by Ice Nine, 06 December 2003 - 01:05 PM.
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#21
Posted 06 December 2003 - 01:55 PM
Edited by superadaquabat, 06 December 2003 - 01:55 PM.
#22
Posted 06 December 2003 - 02:32 PM
Unholy Three: DUPLUM SCRTA, DUPLUM PROBLEMA (2009)
But Zeke guns tend to be like proofs by contradiction
Theoretically solid but actually non-constructive
Rnbw Cln
#23
Posted 06 December 2003 - 09:23 PM
You think MACS are the greatest. Wtf is wrong with you. If they were more compatible with other systems I might agree but when it comes to building a computer from parts you got from a store that didn't want them, macs are a real road block: they won't comply with the other non-mac parts. They're the racists of the computer relm.I think Macs are almost the perfect machines.
#24
Posted 06 December 2003 - 11:42 PM
-Howie
#25
Posted 06 December 2003 - 11:43 PM
There are a few reasons I almost universally prefer PC's to macs. First, the price. I mean cmon, its not even close in that category. Second is the customization. If I have a processor bottleneck in my PC, I just buy a new one and swap it out. You can't do that in a mac. Nor can you buy all of your parts seperately and build a completely kickass system for under $1000. The third is that people always flaunt the mac's performance, like "look at its dual processors" or "look at its 64 bit bla bla bla". It's not backed up with numbers! The entire mac commercial premise that their faster than PC's due to their chip architecture is bullshit. Take for example the dual G5 type of systems that everyone always flaunts. For the same price, I could build 2 dual AMD or dual Intel systems with faster processors, and a helluva lot better graphics card, and I could throw in a cooler looking case and flatscreen monitor. Not to mention the software isn't that great. Ice Nine mentioned iTunes, iChat, and Safari. I personally have no problem with internet explorer, I never have. And AIM is fine for me. If I really wanted a more expansive service, I'd get Trillian. As for iTunes, this is the program that every mac junkie always mentions. It's not that great!! I mean, as a mp3 player it's nothing extraordinary, and the music store isn't unique. I much prefer musicmatch, I think it's internet radio is the best out there.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users