#1
Posted 10 January 2008 - 09:42 PM
Thanks, 2nd loser
#2
Posted 10 January 2008 - 09:54 PM
where f is force in newtons
k is the spring constant (N/m)
and x is the displacement in meters.
Using that equation tells you how much force the spring will give if you know it's constant.
#3
Posted 10 January 2008 - 09:56 PM
Boltsniper.com has the barrel formula in the SCAR or FAR section. It shows how big the barrel should be if you plunger is whatever size big. I'm sure Captain Slug's homemades have some formulas or stuff like that. What type of homemade are you trying to make? You should start with a SNAP 1.2 springer by Carbon, or a BAMF by cxwq. If you do the BAMF, just make sure you mod the sprinkler valve. You can find out how by going to a potato cannon site (spudfiles.com, spudtech.com). If you want the instructional video PM me and I'll upload it for you.
Good luck,
-keef
#4
Posted 10 January 2008 - 10:08 PM
#5
Posted 10 January 2008 - 10:16 PM
You're missing supply volume, passage area (or restriction), projectile weight, and then you would have to have a barrel length to match.
Nope, I'm terrible at math. And since there are so few formulas to go around concerning the performance and design of pneumatic weapons I've had to figure all of this out through practical experimentation.I'm sure Captain Slug's homemades have some formulas or stuff like that.
What I have learned after 6 months of tinkering
Minimum supply volume needed at 35psi to fire a dart to 100 feet (assuming the connection from the supply to the barrel has no restriction) is 4ci. 5-7ci will yield better results or comparable result if the system involve restriction.
Any passages inbetween the supply tank and the barrel need to be 1/4" diameter (or equal in terms of area) or larger in order to not restrict the flow rate of expansion.
There are no off-the-shelf directional control valves usable for Nerf.
Trigger pull load should be under 5 pounds and have as short of a travel distance as possible.
Edited by CaptainSlug, 10 January 2008 - 10:23 PM.
#6
Posted 10 January 2008 - 11:13 PM
"It’s only after you’ve made the mistake and taken the wrong path, do you see all the other options that were before you."
#7
Posted 10 January 2008 - 11:27 PM
CS, by, "ci," you mean in^3 (cubic inches), correct?
I'm in physics so I can help with all that barrel length whatnot if you really want, but I think CS is right... the best way to figure stuff out is just to tinker. Plus, we don't live in a perfect world, so even if you did figure everything mathematically, it still wouldn't be exact.
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#8
Posted 10 January 2008 - 11:42 PM
The best way to find the ideal legnth for any particular gun would be to guess and change the legnth in one inch incriments until it works as well as you like.
General guides can be made for different streanths of guns, but exactness is difficult.
---
<death09>my girlfriend broke up with me and sent me pix of her and her new boyfriend in bed
<ktp753>ouch.
<death09>yeah.i sent them to her dad
#9
Posted 11 January 2008 - 07:26 AM
YesCS, by, "ci," you mean in^3 (cubic inches), correct?
Around 7ci at 35psi with a very nonrestrictive trigger valve will get you Titan level performance (without the pump plugged).
#10
Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:28 AM
If you're in highschool physics, nothing is done with compressible fluids. Also, f= -kx will and does work, it will return the amount of force that the spring pushes back with, not the amount of force going on the dart, friction has to be taken into account. You can just as easily find a constant using feet and pounds if you want.Force does equal the spring constant times the distance, but knowing that doesn't really help at all... as CS said, you also have to take into account... well, all that stuff. And I'm not sure but I don't think you usually find k values with your springs, just part numbers.
CS, by, "ci," you mean in^3 (cubic inches), correct?
I'm in physics so I can help with all that barrel length whatnot if you really want, but I think CS is right... the best way to figure stuff out is just to tinker. Plus, we don't live in a perfect world, so even if you did figure everything mathematically, it still wouldn't be exact.
#11
Posted 11 January 2008 - 10:37 AM
volume of plunger chamber = 4*volume of the barrelWorking from that equation:
lenght of barrel=0.25*(length of pull)*[(radius of plunger chamber)^2]/[(radius of barrel)^2], Where length of pull is how far you pull back the plunger.According to Boltsniper, this won't give you the exact barrel length; however, it can at least give you a good starting point.
PS: Here is the page where Boltsniper placed the formula.
Edited by jwasko, 11 January 2008 - 12:29 PM.
-Jwasko, STILL Sole Surviving member of Steel City Nerf and Sober Sister of the Sex Dwarves
We NERF ON all day, and FUCK OFF all night
#12
Posted 11 January 2008 - 11:18 AM
#14
Posted 11 January 2008 - 04:39 PM
If you're in high school physics, nothing is done with compressible fluids. Also, f= -kx will and does work, it will return the amount of force that the spring pushes back with, not the amount of force going on the dart, friction has to be taken into account. You can just as easily find a constant using feet and pounds if you want.
Yes, I know that, but what are you going to do once you know how much force it takes to pull the spring back? You can determine how fast the air will be pushed out, and how much that will accelerate the dart based on the length of the barrel (assuming you've already calculate that the plunger stroke will produce enough air to fill the barrel). And yes, I can incorporate mew into that as well.
No, we don't work with compressible fluids, but simple kinematics and some common sense can take you a long ways. That being said, if you know about compressible fluids, you could probably find a more accurate answer than myself, but like I said earlier and like CS has kinda been saying, that's all in a perfect world. I'm betting my percent error with your answer as the actual answer, and your percent error with the [/i]actual[/i] answer as the actual answer would be about the same.
...and ideas are bulletproof. "
#15
Posted 11 January 2008 - 06:05 PM
-DTR
That's it. I'm done. I'm sorry there are breasts on the Internet.
#16
Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:08 PM
Joking aside, the coefficient of friction of the dart and barrel is even more important than plunger friction (you're just seeking to minimize that friction, anyway). The dart's friction is what allows the initial pressure to build, but not be so resistant to moving that range suffers.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









