#1
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:08 PM
Thanks
#2
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:14 PM
Both compare pretty equally, but use the search featuure for more details.
#3
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:16 PM
#4
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:24 PM
And to just make it clear, HERE is the EXACT thread title to your topic. So don't tell me you searched.
#5
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:30 PM
And no one post I guess. Since I have the information now.
Edited by tyrant_bb, 04 January 2008 - 02:31 PM.
#6
Posted 05 January 2008 - 12:02 AM
MS pros: Less pumping, More Range, shorter reloading time, lighter (not that weight matters much), It also has one of those rail type things to attach scopes too- used to be worthless but now that the Recon is coming out- you can attach its sight- as well as those lights that just came out.
MS cons: Only 10 shots- then you have to reload, Clip slides back down into the gun if you stop shooting (very easy to fix),
RF20 pros: 20 shots 'till you have to reload, you can fire non-stop until you’re out of rounds.
RF20 cons: Longer reloading time, heavy, range decreases as you keep shooting, more pumps.
--- I really like the MS so, my pros and cons might be because of my preference. I would find someone who really likes MS and someone who really likes RF20, and then compare the pros and cons they give you...
#7
Posted 22 March 2008 - 03:02 PM
So I want to buy a rapid fire gun, mainly for indoor wars. Magstrike and RF20 seem like the only good choices though. I really can't decide what to get, since they seem so alike. So if you've tried both, could you tell me some of the pros and cons of each? Since I'm a pretty big noob too, would I end up breaking 1 or the other?
Thanks
I own both of them and i think You should get the rf20 because it holds more rounds, takes about the same amount of pumps as the ms and it is actually cheaper then the ms (rf20 $27-$30 Ms $30-$35) the ms also occasionally jams and the clip slides down after every burst.
No more comments please.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users